Suggested citation: Katie Siek and Jasmine Batten. (2025). Taulbee Survey 2024: Annual Report. Computing Research Association.

Introduction

The Taulbee Survey, which CRA has performed annually since 1974, has earned prominence as a carefully-structured and reliable source of industry data that is crafted with applicable safeguards. Each year a wide array of members choose to reply to the Taulbee survey, knowing that robust data enhances the validity of results and bolsters the survey’s value to its full spectrum of users. Each fall, CRA surveys academic departments in the United States and Canada that offer a PhD in computer science (CS), computer engineering (CE), or information (I). The Taulbee Survey is the principal source of information on the enrollment, production, and employment of PhDs in information, computer science, and computer engineering (CS, CE, and I) and in providing salary and demographic data for faculty in CS, CE, and I in North America. In 2024, as we do every three years, the Taulbee Survey reports on data related to departmental resources and activities, thus this report provides comprehensive analysis of computing departments including the graduate students, faculty, staff, and resources that make computing innovation and training possible.

New this Year

Change in salary effective date: Based on feedback from the computing community, we changed the salary collection date. Past Taulbee surveys used salaries that took effect during the current year (e.g., in 2023, we reported on salaries that took effect on January 1, 2024), however this year we report on the salary in effect on July 10, 2024. This means that for 2024, we did not provide calculations for Table S21 that provided the change in salary median for departments that reported in the last two years because our data is currently in the same year. We will bring this comparison back in 2025.

Change in demographics: Based on feedback from the computing community, we changed all instances of “American Indian” to “Indigenous” within the survey. This impacts all sections and tables where demographic data is reported across the survey.

Reporting format: The CRA Taulbee Survey report is now available in a redesigned, HTML-based format, improving navigation, accessibility, and user experience for the computing research community.

Departmental Profiles questions: Every three years, the Taulbee Survey collects data about elements of departmental activities that are not expected to change much each year. Included are data about teaching loads, sources of external funding, methods of recruiting graduate students, space, and department support staff. The most recent prior data about these activities were reported in the 2021 Taulbee Survey.

Methods

Adherence

CRA is committed to complying fully with applicable laws and regulations that protect privacy, equality, competition, and other pertinent standards. CRA seeks to protect the Taulbee Survey’s many legitimate purposes by expecting universal commitment to such standards. CRA, a third-party survey administrator, takes due precautions to adhere to laws and ethical principles, such as:

  • maintaining strict confidentiality of all submitted data, which shall not be disclosed in raw form to anyone;
  • engaging a professional survey service to receive and process all data independently;
  • soliciting historical salary data by position;
  • and distributing in the Taulbee survey results (and any related report, publication, or presentation) only data that is aggregate, anonymous, and inclusive of numerous respondents.

CRA encourages community members to engage actively with institutional, local, state, and federal resources.

While CRA may, within appropriate guidelines, offer its members separate reports scoped to subsets of data, all of those likewise contain only aggregate and anonymous data sufficiently broad to preclude identifying any sources of individual data and to ensure that no data source comprises a disproportionate share.

Survey Design

In the spring, the computing community is invited to provide feedback to CRA. This feedback along with other comments and requests received throughout the year is analyzed by CRA staff and reported to the CRA CEO and CRA Survey Committee. The CRA Survey Committee discusses survey edits during the summer and early fall before presenting the finalized survey to CRA CEO by the end of September. For example, this year, we expanded terminology for demographics and tuition to align with U.S. and Canadian systems.

Sample and Survey Distribution

CRA gathers survey data during the fall. Surveys were sent to CRA members, the CRA Deans group members, and participants in the iSchools Caucus (www.ischools.org) who met the criteria of granting Ph.D.s in programs with a strong computing component and being located in North America. Programs who meet these criteria and would like to participate in the survey in future years are invited to contact for inclusion.

In the 2024 survey cycle, CRA emailed all eligible Taulbee survey respondents via the PeerFocus survey management platform in October 2024 to provide data between October 14, 2024 and March 3, 2025. Responses received by March 3, 2025 are included in the analysis. The period covered by the data varies from table to table.

Taulbee Main: Taulbee Main was open from October 14-March 3, 2025. We surveyed a total of 314 Ph.D.-granting departments and received responses from 157, for an overall response rate of 50 percent, down from 56 percent last year. The response rates from CE and Canadian departments in particular continue to be low. The U.S. CS response rate of 61 percent is, as usual, the highest of all of the categories; however, it is lower than last year’s 69 percent and for the second year in a row is the lowest for the past quarter century. Responses from CE and I department types also decreased from their rates last year, however Canadian response rates remained the same. Figure 1 shows the history of the survey’s response rates. Response rates are inexact because some departments provide only partial data, and some institutions provide a single joint response for multiple departments. Thus, in some tables the number of departments shown as reporting will not equal the overall total number of respondents shown in Figure 1 for that category of department.

Taulbee Salary: Taulbee Salary was open from October-December 2024. The Faculty Salaries section data was collected from the Taulbee salary survey. The overall response rate declined for the third year in a row on this survey with 150 institutions total participating (162 respondents in 2023 and 175 respondents in 2022) with the only change coming from less US CS institutions responding. Of the 150 departments, we had responses from 122 U.S. CS (134 in 2023), 4 U.S. CE, 14 U.S. I, and 10 Canadian.

Overall, we had a response rate to the Taulbee Salary survey of 54 percent, while last year’s overall response rate was 61 percent. All department types showed percentage decreases. Among U.S. CS departments, the response rate decreased to 65 percent from 71 percent last year. The CE response rate was 11 percent versus 20 percent last year. The Canadian response rate decreased to 20 percent from 45 percent. The response rate from the U.S. Information departments was 61 percent compared with 74 percent last year, but more I departments received this year’s survey. Of those departments reporting this year, 61 percent provided individual salary data, compared with 57 percent last year. In general, this year’s response rates were more similar to those of two years ago than to last year’s rates.

The data collected from the Graduate Student Support section was departments that responded to these questions in either Taulbee Salary or Taulbee Main, as these questions are asked in both surveys. If a department responded to both surveys, their response from Taulbee Main was used.

To account for the changes in response rate, we comment not only on aggregate totals but also on averages per department reporting or data from those departments that responded to both 2023 and 2024 surveys. This is a more meaningful indication of the one-year changes affecting the data.

Analysis

CRA Research Associates used Peer Focus to validate data input (e.g., user errors) and then downloaded the data to clean and analyze it in R. Tables and visualizations were generated to provide a statistical summary of the unit level data.

We used the following reporting thresholds when reporting data:

  • If fewer than 4 units, nothing
  • If 4-6 units, median only
  • If 7-9 units, 25 percentile, median, 75 percentile
  • If 10+ units, 10 percentile, 25 percentile, median, 75 percentile, 90 percentile.
  • If reporting thresholds were not met, we reported “NA” in the tables.

Most of these academic units are departments, but some are colleges or schools of information or computing. In this report, we will use the term “department” to refer to the unit offering the program.

Degree production and enrollment (PhD, Master’s, and Bachelor’s) refer to the previous academic year (2023-24). Data for new students and projected student production in all categories refer to the current academic year (2024-25). Salaries are those effective on July 10, 2024.

Degree, enrollment, and faculty salary data for the U.S CS departments are stratified according to: a) whether the institution is public or private; and b) the tenure-track faculty size of the reporting department. The faculty size strata deliberately overlap, so that data from most departments affect multiple strata. This may be especially useful to departments near the boundary of one stratum. Salary data is also stratified according to the population of the locale in which the institution is located. Specifically, an institution’s population classification is based on the Carnegie Classification database where large cities have a population of >= 250,000 people, mid-size cities have a population of 100,000 and 250,000 people, and town/rural populations are less than 100,000 people. These stratifications allow our readers to triangulate between the multiple tables to understand the context of the salary data. In addition to tabular presentations of data, we will use “box and whisker” diagrams to show medians, quartiles, and the range between the 10th and 90th percentile data points.

We thank all of the respondents to this year’s questionnaire.

Figure 1: Number of respondents to the Taulbee Survey

Year US CS US CE Canada US Info Total
1995 110/133 (83%) 9/13 (69%) 11/16 (69%) 130/162 (80%)
1996 98/131 (75%) 8/13 (62%) 9/16 (56%) 115/160 (72%)
1997 111/133 (83%) 6/13 (46%) 13/17 (76%) 130/163 (80%)
1998 122/145 (84%) 7/19 (37%) 12/18 (67%) 141/182 (77%)
1999 132/156 (85%) 5/24 (21%) 19/23 (83%) 156/203 (77%)
2000 148/163 (91%) 6/28 (21%) 19/23 (83%) 173/214 (81%)
2001 142/164 (87) 8/28 (29%) 23/23 (100%) 173/215 (80%)
2002 150/170 (88%) 10/28 (36%) 22/27 (82%) 182/225 (80%)
2003 148/170 (87%) 6/28 (21%) 19/27 (70%) 173/225 (77%)
2004 158/172 (92%) 10/30 (33%) 21/27 (78%) 189/229 (83%)
2005 156/174 (90%) 10/31 (32%) 22/27 (81%) 188/232 (81%)
2006 156/175 (89%) 12/33 (36%) 20/28 (71%) 188/235 (80%)
2007 155/176 (88%) 10/30 (33%) 21/28 (75%) 186/234 (79%)
2008 151/181 (83%) 12/32 (38%) 20/30 (67%) 9/19 (47%) 192/264 (73%)
2009 147/184(80%) 13/31 (42%) 16/30 (53.3%) 12/20 (60%) 188/265 (71%)
2010 150/184 (82%) 12/30 (40%) 18/29 (62%) 15/22 (68%) 195/265 (74%)
2011 142/185 (77%) 13/31 (42%) 13/30 (43%) 16/21 (76%) 184/267 (69%)
2012 152/189 (80%) 11/32 (34%) 14/30 (47%) 16/26 (62%) 193/277 (70%)
2013 144/188 (77%) 10/30 (33%) 14/26 (54%) 11/22 (50%) 179/266 (67%)
2014 143/188 (76%) 13/31 (42%) 12/26 (46%) 13/19 (68%) 181/268 (68%)
2015 146/190(77%) 8/32 (25%) 12/26 (46%) 12/18 (67%) 178/266 (67%)
2016 150/188 (80%) 8/33 (24%) 11/26 (42%) 14/21 (67%) 183/268 (68%)
2017 148/192 (77%) 8/35 (23%) 11/30 (37%) 14/24 (58%) 181/281 (64%)
2018 143/195 (73%) 5/34 (15%) 12/30 (40%) 14/24 (58%) 174/283 (61%)
2019 148/192 (77%) 7/35 (20%) 11/29 (38%) 15/22 (68%) 181/278 (65%)
2020 150/193 (78%) 6/35 (17%) 8/29 (28%) 15/22 (68%) 179/279 (64%)
2021 142/195 (73%) 6/35 (17%) 8/29 (28%) 15/23 (65%) 171/282 (61%)
2022 146/205 (71%) 7/35 (20%) 14/34 (41%) 15/23 (65%) 182/297 (61%)
2023 144/210 (69%) 6/38 (16%) 11/36 (31%) 15/30 (50%) 176/314 (56%)
2024 129/210 (61%) 3/38 (8%) 11/36 (31%) 14/30 (47%) 157/314 (50%)

Doctoral Program Production, Enrollment, Employment, and Applications

This year’s CRA Taulbee Survey respondents reported another all-time high in doctoral degree production, breaking the 2022–23 record by 8.2 percent. Among departments reporting both this year and last year, the number of total doctoral degrees increased by 10.5 percent compared to the previous year. Among U.S. CS departments reporting both years, there was an increase in production of doctoral degrees by 12.7% (Table 1). 

The total doctoral enrollment reported by this year’s responding departments when all departments are included barely increased––0.7%, down from 4.7% change last year, meanwhile US CS departments enrollment reported a 3.7% change (down from 6.9% change last year). Of note is that there are 8 less US CS and US CE departments reporting and 3 less I departments reporting which may impact enrollment numbers. When we look at departments that reported both years, doctoral enrollment increased 6% (up from 3% change last year) when aggregated across all departments and increased 6.6% across US CS departments. These percent increases are higher than the last two years among departments reporting year-over-year (Table 1).

Table D1: PhD production and pipeline by department type

PhDs awarded represents those awarded during July 1, 2023 - June 30, 2024.
PhDs Awarded
PhDs Next Year
Passed Qualifier
Passed Thesis (if dept. has)
Dept. Type Num. depts. Num. PhDs awarded Avg. PhDs per dept. Num. PhDs next year Avg. PhDs next year per dept. Num. passed qualifier Avg. passed qualifier per dept. Num. passed thesis Num. depts. with thesis Avg. passed thesis per dept.
US CS Public 90 1,523 17.5 1,884 23.0 1,829 23.8 1,412 73 19.3
US CS Private 35 542 20.1 744 24.8 567 20.2 319 23 13.9
US CS Total 125 2,065 18.1 2,628 23.5 2,396 22.8 1,731 96 18.0
US CE 3 43 14.3 54 27.0 8 8.0 0 0 NaN
US Info 14 128 9.8 157 11.2 158 13.2 211 13 16.2
Canada 11 116 11.6 185 16.8 253 28.1 184 8 23.0
Total 153 2,352 16.8 3,024 21.8 2,815 22.2 2,126 117 18.2

This year’s respondents reported another all-time high doctoral degree production of 2,352 for the 2023-24 academic year, breaking the 2022-23 record of 2,173 by 8.2% (Figure D1). U.S. CS departments in both public and private institutions increased their production. Even though 10 more departments reported this year (N=125) compared to last year (N=115), we also see a small increase in average PhDs awarded per department in US CS departments. This year, no areas decreased production. On a per-department basis, the overall increase across the three computing areas was 8.4%, from 15.5 to 16.8 (Table D1).

We report on passing qualifier and thesis exams as a proxy for progress, however the timeframes depend on departmental requirements that vary between programs and institutions, thus comparisons should be considered with caution (Table D1). Overall, average passing of qualifying exams increased by 2.2 from 20 to 22.2 in 2024.  At U.S. CS departments, the average number of students per department who passed qualifier exams in 2023-24 increased slightly to 22.8  (20.7 last year). Unlike last year, the average per department was slightly higher at CS public institutions (23.8) than private (20.2). Canadian universities increased qualifying passing by 10 to 28.1 up from 18.2. I schools had a slight increase to 13.2, up from 10.3 last year. 

The thesis passing average, shown in Table D1, stayed constant from last year at 18.2 (18.3 last year). The average number per U.S. CS department who passed thesis candidacy exams in 2023-24 (most, but not all, departments have such exams) increased slightly to 18 from 17.6 last year; similar to last year public institutions showed an increase in the average who passed thesis candidacy (from 18.1 to 19.3), while private institution showed a decrease from last year’s level (from 15.8 to 13.9). I and Canadian departments increased an average of 1 in each department’s thesis passing rate.

Table D2: PhDs awarded by gender

This data represents PhDs awarded during July 1, 2023 - June 30, 2024.
Gender CS PhDs Awarded CS % CE PhDs Awarded CE % I PhDs Awarded I % Total Total %
Female 465 24.5% 29 20.7% 79 44.6% 573 25.9%
Male 1,426 75.1% 111 79.3% 96 54.2% 1,633 73.7%
Nonbinary/Other 7 0.4% 0 0% 2 1.1% 9 0.4%
Total Known Gender 1,898 140 177 2,215
Unknown 134 1 2 137
Total 2,032 141 179 2,352

Among 2023-24 PhD recipients aggregated across CS, CE and I, 25.9% identified as female, up slightly from 24.1% in 2022–23. In CS, the increase for females was from 22.7 to 24.5%. Of note is that 6.6% of CS degree recipients did not have their gender reported—similar to last year when 7% did not report, however in the past, less than one-half of one percent did not report; thus, these year-over-year gender comparisons cannot provide a complete picture. In CE, female representation stayed the same from last year at 22.0%, but was 14.5% in 2021-2022. After a decrease in 2022-2023, I female representation has increased above 2021-2022 levels from 40.0% to 44.6% (Table D2).

Table D3: PhDs awarded by ethnicity

This data represents PhDs awarded during July 1, 2023 - June 30, 2024.
Residency and Race/Ethnicity CS PhDs Awarded CS % CE PhDs Awarded CE % I PhDs Awarded I % Total Total %
Nonresident Alien 1,132 65.9% 73 55.7% 93 54.7% 1,298 64.3%
Resident, Indigenous or Alaskan Native 2 0.1% 0 0% 0 0% 2 0.1%
Resident, Asian 174 10.1% 30 22.9% 14 8.2% 218 10.8%
Resident, African American Non Hispanic 22 1.3% 1 0.8% 6 3.5% 29 1.4%
Resident, Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 2 0.1% 1 0.8% 0 0% 3 0.1%
Resident, White, Non-Hispanic 337 19.6% 20 15.3% 50 29.4% 407 20.2%
Resident, More than one Race Specified, non-Hispanic 12 0.7% 4 3.1% 3 1.8% 19 0.9%
Resident, Hispanic 37 2.2% 2 1.5% 4 2.4% 43 2.1%
Residency & Ethnicity Known 1,718 131 170 2,019
Resident, Ethnicity Unknown 101 3 2 106
Residency Unknown 213 7 7 227
Total 2,032 141 179 2,352

When we look at PhDs awarded by race/ethnicity, we continue to see a lack of reporting in CS for Ph.D. recipients with 15.4% not reporting, down from 18.5% last year, but still up from 7% in 2021-2022. Among those with ethnicity reported, the CS distribution across race/ethnicity is similar to that reported last year, however decreases were reported in Nonresident Alien (0.3 percentage point decrease) and Resident White (0.1 percentage point decrease). In CE, Resident Asian (8.1 percentage point increase) and Residents, More than One Race Specified (3.1 percentage point increase), and Resident, Hispanic (0.6 percentage point increase) racial/ethnic categories increased compared to last year. I PhD recipients had similar demographics compared to last year with Nonresident Aliens (1 percentage point decrease) and Resident Asian (1 percentage point decrease) decreasing more than 1 percentage point (Table D3), with Resident, White being the only racial/ethnic category to see an increase (2.4 percentage point increase).

Among new 2023–24 PhDs for whom employment information was known, 54.3 percent accepted positions in North American industry— down from 57.5% the prior year. Conversely, 38.7% took academic jobs in North America, a notable increase from 30.6%.

Table D4: Employment of new PhD recipients by specialty

All Employment Locations

This data represents employment of PhDs who earned their PhDs between July 1, 2023 - June 30, 2024.
Scroll horizontally to view additional columns and totals.
Employment Type Artificial Intelligence/ Machine Learning Hardware/ Architecture High Performance Computing Human-Computer Interaction Informatics: Biomedical/ Other Science Information Systems Other Programming Languages/ Compilers Robotics/ Vision Scientific/ Numerical Computing Security/ Information Assurance Software Engineering Unknown Databases/ Information Retrieval Graphics/ Visualization Information Science Networks Operating Systems Social Computing/ Social Informatics/ CSCW Theory and Algorithms Computing Education Total Percent
Government 10 1 2 2 3 1 6 2 1 2 4 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 41 1.7%
Industry Non-Research 62 7 7 9 1 18 9 13 12 6 20 23 6 11 7 3 12 9 4 7 0 246 10.5%
Industry Postdoc 2 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 1 0 2 0 2 1 3 1 1 0 0 4 0 21 0.9%
Industry Research 229 20 9 31 18 17 28 12 48 7 26 8 39 17 13 16 12 17 6 30 1 604 25.7%
Industry Type Unknown 15 1 3 2 1 1 2 2 3 1 2 4 8 1 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 50 2.1%
Non CS/CE/I Dept 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 1 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0.4%
Other 4 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 5 2 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 19 0.8%
Other CS/CE/I Dept 10 0 1 5 0 0 1 2 1 0 5 1 3 1 0 1 3 2 0 1 3 40 1.7%
PhD Dept Postdoc 68 5 4 13 19 4 17 9 15 4 11 4 19 5 6 3 5 7 4 20 7 249 10.6%
PhD Dept Researcher 22 0 0 9 4 2 8 6 4 0 2 1 13 1 4 3 1 0 2 8 4 94 4%
PhD Dept Teaching 16 1 1 6 0 2 2 3 2 1 2 4 12 0 4 1 3 1 4 9 6 80 3.4%
PhD Dept Tenure Track 44 4 8 20 5 6 12 5 7 0 24 8 20 15 4 10 6 5 6 8 7 224 9.5%
Self-Employed 8 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 19 0.8%
Unemployed 7 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 15 0.6%
Unknown 48 5 7 16 4 8 56 4 8 2 16 7 406 9 12 2 8 5 2 15 1 641 27.3%
Grand Total 545 44 42 119 56 62 146 59 107 24 114 62 545 65 57 43 51 46 29 107 29 2352 100.0%

Employed in US or Canada

This data represents employment of PhDs who earned their PhDs between July 1, 2023 - June 30, 2024.
Employment Type Artificial Intelligence/ Machine Learning Hardware/ Architecture High Performance Computing Human-Computer Interaction Informatics: Biomedical/ Other Science Information Systems Other Programming Languages/ Compilers Robotics/ Vision Scientific/ Numerical Computing Security/ Information Assurance Software Engineering Unknown Databases/ Information Retrieval Graphics/ Visualization Information Science Networks Operating Systems Social Computing/ Social Informatics/ CSCW Theory and Algorithms Computing Education Total Percent
Government 9 1 2 2 3 1 6 2 1 2 4 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 2.4%
Industry Non-Research 59 7 5 9 1 18 9 12 12 6 18 22 3 11 7 3 12 9 4 7 0 234 14.7%
Industry Postdoc 2 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 3 1 1 0 0 3 0 18 1.1%
Industry Research 213 18 9 28 18 17 27 11 45 7 25 7 34 17 13 16 11 17 6 26 1 566 35.6%
Industry Type Unknown 14 1 3 1 0 1 2 2 2 1 2 4 7 1 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 45 2.8%
Non CS/CE/I Dept 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 1 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0.6%
Other 4 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0.7%
Other CS/CE/I Dept 9 0 1 5 0 0 1 2 1 0 4 1 2 1 0 1 3 1 0 1 3 36 2.3%
PhD Dept Postdoc 62 3 3 12 18 3 14 6 15 3 9 2 18 5 5 3 5 7 4 16 7 220 13.9%
PhD Dept Researcher 21 0 0 8 4 2 8 6 4 0 1 1 12 1 4 3 0 0 2 7 3 87 5.5%
PhD Dept Teaching 15 1 1 6 0 2 2 2 2 1 1 3 11 0 4 1 2 1 4 9 6 74 4.7%
PhD Dept Tenure Track 38 3 7 16 4 5 11 5 5 0 20 6 15 11 4 9 4 5 3 8 7 186 11.7%
Self-Employed 8 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 17 1.1%
Unemployed 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 8 0.5%
Unknown 4 0 1 5 0 1 4 1 2 1 2 0 14 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 39 2.5%
Grand Total 463 34 32 98 49 53 89 49 94 22 87 48 124 52 43 40 39 40 25 80 27 1588 100.0%

Employed outside US or Canada

This data represents employment of PhDs who earned their PhDs between July 1, 2023 - June 30, 2024.
Employment Type Artificial Intelligence/ Machine Learning Security/ Information Assurance Software Engineering Theory and Algorithms Hardware/ Architecture Human-Computer Interaction Networks Other Programming Languages/ Compilers Robotics/ Vision Unknown Information Science Operating Systems Graphics/ Visualization Informatics: Biomedical/ Other Science Information Systems Scientific/ Numerical Computing Computing Education Databases/ Information Retrieval High Performance Computing Social Computing/ Social Informatics/ CSCW Total Percent
Industry Non-Research 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 5.1%
Industry Postdoc 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1.7%
Industry Research 6 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 17.8%
Industry Type Unknown 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1.7%
Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0.8%
Other CS/CE/I Dept 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 3.4%
PhD Dept Postdoc 5 2 2 4 1 1 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 25 21.2%
PhD Dept Researcher 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 7 5.9%
PhD Dept Teaching 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4.2%
PhD Dept Tenure Track 6 3 2 0 1 4 2 1 0 1 5 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 4 1 3 36 30.5%
Self-Employed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0.8%
Unknown 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 8 6.8%
Grand Total 24 12 7 8 4 8 5 5 5 4 15 2 1 3 2 2 1 1 4 2 3 118 100.0%

Table D5: New PhD students by department type

This data represents newly admitted PhD students enrolled in Fall 2024.
Scroll horizontally to view additional columns and totals.
CS
CE
I
Total
Dept. Type # Depts. CS New Admit CS MS to PhD CS Total CS Avg. per. Dept. CE New Admit CE MS to PhD CE Total CE Avg. per. Dept. I New Admit I MS to PhD I Total I Avg. per. Dept. Total Avg. per. dept.
US CS Public 87 2,246 198 2,444 28.8 101 10 111 5.0 56 11 67 2.9 2,622 30.1
US CS Private 35 1,144 37 1,181 33.7 2 0 2 0.3 12 0 12 2.0 1,195 34.1
US CS Total 122 3,390 235 3,625 30.2 103 10 113 3.9 68 11 79 2.7 3,817 31.3
US CE 3 0 0 0 0.0 89 1 90 30.0 0 0 0 0.0 90 30.0
US Info 14 13 1 14 3.5 0 0 0 0.0 165 8 173 12.4 187 13.4
Canada 11 199 7 206 18.7 9 0 9 4.5 0 0 0 0.0 215 19.5
Total 150 3,602 243 3,845 28.3 201 11 212 5.9 233 19 252 5.6 4,309 28.7

The number of reported new PhD students per department increased by 7% this year compared with last year’s reporting departments when all departments are considered (28.7 reported this year vs. 26.8 last year) as shown in Table D5. Overall, the percent difference has wavered between 15 and 5% in the last five years, thus it is difficult to see if this is a trend. U.S. CS departments across all three types, public, private, and Canadian institutions showed increases. Similar to last year, among departments that reported both years, the number of new PhD students increased among both U.S. CS departments and all departments combined (Tables 1).

Table D5a: New PhD students from outside North America

This data represents newly admitted PhD students enrolled in Fall 2024 from outside North America. It also includes those who transferred from a Master’s program.
Dept. Type CS Total CE Total I Total Total New Outside Total New % outside North America
US CS Public 1,565 79 40 1,684 2,622 64.2%
US CS Private 500 1 7 508 1,195 42.5%
US CS Total 2,065 80 47 2,192 3,817 57.4%
US CE 0 47 0 47 90 52.2%
US Info 9 0 110 119 187 63.6%
Canada 128 5 0 133 215 61.9%
Total 2,202 132 157 2,491 4,309 57.8%

The proportion of new doctoral students from outside North America returned to 2022 levels back to 57.8% from 61.9% in 2023 and 57.3% in 2022.  Only Canadian departments increased new PhD students from outside North America from 43.3% to 61.9%, otherwise departments saw decreases (Table D5a).

Table D6: PhD enrollment by department type

This data represents PhD students enrolled on average last year between July 1, 2023 - June 30, 2024.
Dept. Type # Depts. CS Total CS % CE Total CE % I Total I % Total Total %
US CS Public 90 12,038 65.1% 593 48% 530 32.2% 13,161 61.6%
US CS Private 34 5,102 27.6% 97 7.9% 60 3.6% 5,259 24.6%
US CS Total 124 17,140 92.7% 690 55.9% 590 35.8% 18,420 86.2%
US CE 3 0 0% 517 41.9% 0 0% 517 2.4%
US Info 14 115 0.6% 0 0% 1,057 64.2% 1,172 5.5%
Canada 10 1,244 6.7% 28 2.3% 0 0% 1,272 5.9%
Total 151 18,499 100% 1,235 100% 1,647 100% 21,381 100%

Table D7: PhD enrollment by gender

This data represents PhD students enrolled on average last year between July 1, 2023 - June 30, 2024.
Gender CS PhDs Enrolled CS % CE PhDs Enrolled CE % I PhDs Enrolled I % Total Total %
Male 12,843 74.3% 968 78.6% 793 49.4% 14,604 72.6%
Female 4,399 25.5% 263 21.4% 797 49.6% 5,459 27.1%
Nonbinary/Other 40 0.2% 0 0% 16 1% 56 0.3%
Total Known Gender 17,282 1,231 1,606 20,119
Unknown 1,217 4 41 1,262
Total 18,499 1,235 1,647 21,381

The share of females among enrolled doctoral students of known gender slightly increased from 26.3% to 27.1%. In CS, the fraction increased slightly from 25.2% to 25.5% (Table D7). Enrolled female doctoral students in CE and I also saw small increases; CE increased 2.2 percentage points to 21.4% from 19.2%; I increased 2.9 percentage points to 49.6% from 46.7%. This year, the number of doctoral students enrolled whose gender was not reported decreased significantly for I from 12.7% to 5.9% and for CS from 7.5% to 6.6%, thus the year-over-year comparisons will be affected.

Table D8: PhD enrollment by ethnicity

This data represents PhD students enrolled on average last year between July 1, 2023 - June 30, 2024.
Residency and Race/Ethnicity CS PhDs Enrolled CS % CE PhDs Enrolled CE % I PhDs Enrolled I % Total Total %
Nonresident Alien 10,453 68.1% 836 71.6% 884 56.1% 12,173 67.3%
Resident, Indigenous or Alaskan Native 11 0.1% 0 0% 3 0.2% 14 0.1%
Resident, Asian 1,472 9.6% 84 7.2% 147 9.3% 1,703 9.4%
Resident, Black or African American 249 1.6% 14 1.2% 76 4.8% 339 1.9%
Resident, Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 10 0.1% 1 0.1% 0 0% 11 0.1%
Resident, White 2,622 17.1% 173 14.8% 355 22.5% 3,150 17.4%
Resident, More than one Race Specified, non-Hispanic 189 1.2% 18 1.5% 47 3% 254 1.4%
Resident, Hispanic, any race 334 2.2% 41 3.5% 63 4% 438 2.4%
Total Residency & Ethnicity Known 15,340 1,167 1,575 18,082
Resident, Ethnicity Unknown 584 61 25 670
Residency Unknown 2,575 7 47 2,629
Total 18,499 1,235 1,647 21,381

Analysis of the doctoral enrollment diversity by race/ethnicity, shown in Table D8, should be considered in relation to the number of student residency that is not reported. This year, the percentage of students who did not have race/ethnicity reported decreased 1.7 percentage points, with 15.5% of all students not having race and ethnicity reporting (down from 17.2% last year). CS continues to have the most nonreporting with 17.1% of students with unknown race/ethnicity, whereas CE and I have less than 6% this year (down from 28.5% for CE and 12.8% for I). 

Among those students whose race/ethnicity is known (Table D8), the overall fraction of doctoral students who were neither Nonresident Aliens, Asian, nor White was 5.9%, up slightly from 5.6% last year. In CS programs, this year’s fraction was 5.2%, with no change from last year. In CE programs, the percentage decreased from 6.9% to 6.3% this year. I programs increased slightly from 10.6% to 12%. 

The fraction of enrolled doctoral students who were Nonresident Aliens is higher than last year at 67.3%, increasing 1.5 percentage points from last year (Table D8). The largest change came from CE, up from 68.1 % to 71.6%, whereas CS had a 1.5 percentage point increase and I saw no change from last year.

Table D9 shows the gender x race/ethnicity cross-tabs for doctoral recipients. Within each area, this table shows the percentage of graduates of each gender that were of a given race/ethnicity. Due to the non-reporting issues discussed above, the I area is the one for which a year-over-year comparison is most reliable. It shows Nonresident Alien of both male (54.9%) and female (57.3%) make up over half of Information PhD graduates, as has been seen in the past.

Table D9: PhDs awarded by gender and ethnicity

Computer Science

This data represents PhDs awarded during July 1, 2023 - June 30, 2024.
Residency and Race/Ethnicity # Depts Male % of M Female % of F NB/Other % of NBO N/R Total Total %
Nonresident Alien 101 854 66.4% 267 65.1% 1 14.3% 10 1,132 65.9%
Resident, African American Non Hispanic 16 10 0.8% 10 2.4% 1 14.3% 1 22 1.3%
Resident, Asian 55 125 9.7% 46 11.2% 2 28.6% 1 174 10.1%
Resident, Hispanic 27 26 2% 10 2.4% 0 0% 1 37 2.2%
Resident, Indigenous or Alaskan Native 2 1 0.1% 1 0.2% 0 0% 0 2 0.1%
Resident, More than one Race Specified, non-Hispanic 9 9 0.7% 3 0.7% 0 0% 0 12 0.7%
Resident, Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 2 0 0% 2 0.5% 0 0% 0 2 0.1%
Resident, White, Non-Hispanic 89 262 20.4% 71 17.3% 3 42.9% 1 337 19.6%
Residency & Ethnicity Known 112 1,287 410 7 14 1,718
Resident, Ethnicity Unknown 27 67 24 0 10 101
Residency Unknown 25 72 31 0 110 213
Total 124 1,426 465 7 134 2,032

Computer Engineering

This data represents PhDs awarded during July 1, 2023 - June 30, 2024.
Residency and Race/Ethnicity # Depts Male % of M Female % of F NB/Other % of NBO N/R Total Total %
Nonresident Alien 15 61 58.7% 12 44.4% 0 NaN% 0 73 55.7%
Resident, African American Non Hispanic 1 1 1% 0 0% 0 NaN% 0 1 0.8%
Resident, Asian 11 20 19.2% 10 37% 0 NaN% 0 30 22.9%
Resident, Hispanic 2 2 1.9% 0 0% 0 NaN% 0 2 1.5%
Resident, Indigenous or Alaskan Native 0 0 NaN% 0 NaN% 0 NaN% 0 0 NaN%
Resident, More than one Race Specified, non-Hispanic 2 3 2.9% 1 3.7% 0 NaN% 0 4 3.1%
Resident, Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 1 0 0% 1 3.7% 0 NaN% 0 1 0.8%
Resident, White, Non-Hispanic 10 17 16.3% 3 11.1% 0 NaN% 0 20 15.3%
Residency & Ethnicity Known 18 104 27 0 0 131
Resident, Ethnicity Unknown 3 3 0 0 0 3
Residency Unknown 3 4 2 0 1 7
Total 20 111 29 0 1 141

Information

This data represents PhDs awarded during July 1, 2023 - June 30, 2024.
Residency and Race/Ethnicity # Depts Male % of M Female % of F NB/Other % of NBO N/R Total Total %
Nonresident Alien 20 50 54.9% 43 57.3% 0 0% 0 93 54.7%
Resident, African American Non Hispanic 5 2 2.2% 4 5.3% 0 0% 0 6 3.5%
Resident, Asian 7 11 12.1% 3 4% 0 0% 0 14 8.2%
Resident, Hispanic 4 3 3.3% 1 1.3% 0 0% 0 4 2.4%
Resident, Indigenous or Alaskan Native 0 0 NaN% 0 NaN% 0 NaN% 0 0 NaN%
Resident, More than one Race Specified, non-Hispanic 2 0 0% 3 4% 0 0% 0 3 1.8%
Resident, Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 0 0 NaN% 0 NaN% 0 NaN% 0 0 NaN%
Resident, White, Non-Hispanic 20 25 27.5% 21 28% 2 100% 2 50 29.4%
Residency & Ethnicity Known 24 91 75 2 2 170
Resident, Ethnicity Unknown 2 0 2 0 0 2
Residency Unknown 3 5 2 0 0 7
Total 25 96 79 2 2 179

Table D10: PhD enrollment by gender and ethnicity

Computer Science

This data represents PhDs awarded during July 1, 2023 - June 30, 2024.
Residency and Race/Ethnicity Male % of M Female % of F NB/Other % of NBO N/R Total Total %
Nonresident Alien 7,818 68.7% 2,558 66.8% 10 30.3% 67 10,453 68.1%
Resident, Indigenous or Alaskan Native 10 0.1% 1 0% 0 0% 0 11 0.1%
Resident, Asian 1,001 8.8% 458 12% 6 18.2% 7 1,472 9.6%
Resident, Black or African American 159 1.4% 90 2.4% 0 0% 0 249 1.6%
Resident, Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 7 0.1% 3 0.1% 0 0% 0 10 0.1%
Resident, White 1,998 17.5% 597 15.6% 11 33.3% 16 2,622 17.1%
Resident, More than one Race Specified, non-Hispanic 133 1.2% 55 1.4% 0 0% 1 189 1.2%
Resident, Hispanic, any race 261 2.3% 67 1.7% 6 18.2% 0 334 2.2%
Total Residency & Ethnicity Known 11,387 3,829 33 91 15,340
Residency and/or Ethnicity Unknown 1,456 570 7 1,126 3,159
Total 12,843 4,399 40 1,217 18,499

Computer Engineering

This data represents PhDs awarded during July 1, 2023 - June 30, 2024.
Residency and Race/Ethnicity Male % of M Female % of F NB/Other % of NBO N/R Total Total %
Nonresident Alien 650 70.5% 184 76% 0 NaN% 2 836 71.6%
Resident, Indigenous or Alaskan Native 0 0% 0 0% 0 NaN% 0 0 0%
Resident, Asian 67 7.3% 17 7% 0 NaN% 0 84 7.2%
Resident, Black or African American 11 1.2% 3 1.2% 0 NaN% 0 14 1.2%
Resident, Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 0 0% 1 0.4% 0 NaN% 0 1 0.1%
Resident, White 147 15.9% 25 10.3% 0 NaN% 1 173 14.8%
Resident, More than one Race Specified, non-Hispanic 15 1.6% 3 1.2% 0 NaN% 0 18 1.5%
Resident, Hispanic, any race 32 3.5% 9 3.7% 0 NaN% 0 41 3.5%
Total Residency & Ethnicity Known 922 242 0 3 1,167
Residency and/or Ethnicity Unknown 46 21 0 1 68
Total 968 263 0 4 1,235

Information

This data represents PhDs awarded during July 1, 2023 - June 30, 2024.
Residency and Race/Ethnicity Male % of M Female % of F NB/Other % of NBO N/R Total Total %
Nonresident Alien 464 60.5% 392 52% 2 15.4% 26 884 56.1%
Resident, Indigenous or Alaskan Native 2 0.3% 1 0.1% 0 0% 0 3 0.2%
Resident, Asian 67 8.7% 78 10.3% 1 7.7% 1 147 9.3%
Resident, Black or African American 26 3.4% 48 6.4% 1 7.7% 1 76 4.8%
Resident, Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0 0%
Resident, White 164 21.4% 173 22.9% 7 53.8% 11 355 22.5%
Resident, More than one Race Specified, non-Hispanic 21 2.7% 24 3.2% 2 15.4% 0 47 3%
Resident, Hispanic, any race 23 3% 38 5% 0 0% 2 63 4%
Total Residency & Ethnicity Known 767 754 13 41 1,575
Residency and/or Ethnicity Unknown 26 43 3 0 72
Total 793 797 16 41 1,647

Table D11: New PhD enrollment by gender

This data represents newly admitted PhD students enrolled in Fall 2024.
Gender CS PhDs Newly Enrolled CS % CE PhDs Newly Enrolled CE % I PhDs Newly Enrolled I % Total Total %
Male 2,504 75.2% 157 75.5% 184 52% 2,845 73.1%
Female 816 24.5% 49 23.6% 164 46.3% 1,029 26.4%
Nonbinary/Other 10 0.3% 2 1% 6 1.7% 18 0.5%
Total Known Gender 3,330 208 354 3,892
Unknown 236 19 6 261
Total 3,566 227 360 4,153

Table D12: New PhD enrollment by ethnicity

This data represents newly admitted PhD students enrolled in Fall 2024.
Residency and Race/Ethnicity CS PhDs Newly Enrolled CS % CE PhDs Newly Enrolled CE % I PhDs Newly Enrolled I % Total Total %
Nonresident Alien 2,162 70.9% 158 77.5% 211 67.6% 2,531 71%
Resident, Asian 325 10.7% 8 3.9% 16 5.1% 349 9.8%
Resident, Black or African American 54 1.8% 1 0.5% 7 2.2% 62 1.7%
Resident, Hispanic, any race 51 1.7% 4 2% 10 3.2% 65 1.8%
Resident, Indigenous or Alaskan Native 2 0.1% 0 0% 0 0% 2 0.1%
Resident, More than one Race Specified, non-Hispanic 42 1.4% 3 1.5% 5 1.6% 50 1.4%
Resident, Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 0 0% 0 0% 1 0.3% 1 0%
Resident, White 415 13.6% 30 14.7% 62 19.9% 507 14.2%
Total Residency & Ethnicity Known 3,051 100% 204 100% 312 100% 3,567 100%
Resident, Ethnicity Unknown 76 10 3 89
Residency Unknown 439 13 45 497
Total 3,566 227 360 4,153

Table D13: New PhD enrollment by gender and ethnicity

Computer Science

This data represents newly admitted PhD students enrolled in Fall 2024.
Residency and Race/Ethnicity Male % of M Female % of F NB/Other % of NBO N/R Total Total %
Nonresident Alien 1,639 72.7% 500 67.6% 2 25% 21 2,162 70.9%
Resident, Indigenous or Alaskan Native 1 0% 1 0.1% 0 0% 0 2 0.1%
Resident, Asian 210 9.3% 91 12.3% 1 12.5% 23 325 10.7%
Resident, Black or African American 32 1.4% 20 2.7% 0 0% 2 54 1.8%
Resident, Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0 0%
Resident, White 299 13.3% 109 14.7% 3 37.5% 4 415 13.6%
Resident, More than one Race Specified, non-Hispanic 35 1.6% 7 0.9% 0 0% 0 42 1.4%
Resident, Hispanic, any race 37 1.6% 12 1.6% 2 25% 0 51 1.7%
Total Residency & Ethnicity Known 2,253 740 8 50 3,051
Residency and/or Race/Ethnicity Unknown 251 76 2 186 515
Total 2,504 816 10 236 3,566

Computer Engineering

This data represents newly admitted PhD students enrolled in Fall 2024.
Residency and Race/Ethnicity Male % of M Female % of F NB/Other % of NBO N/R Total Total %
Nonresident Alien 122 79.2% 33 71.7% 1 50% 2 158 77.5%
Resident, Indigenous or Alaskan Native 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0 0%
Resident, Asian 6 3.9% 2 4.3% 0 0% 0 8 3.9%
Resident, Black or African American 0 0% 1 2.2% 0 0% 0 1 0.5%
Resident, Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0 0%
Resident, White 21 13.6% 8 17.4% 1 50% 0 30 14.7%
Resident, More than one Race Specified, non-Hispanic 3 1.9% 0 0% 0 0% 0 3 1.5%
Resident, Hispanic, any race 2 1.3% 2 4.3% 0 0% 0 4 2%
Total Residency & Ethnicity Known 154 46 2 2 204
Residency and/or Race/Ethnicity Unknown 3 3 0 17 23
Total 157 49 2 19 227

Information

This data represents newly admitted PhD students enrolled in Fall 2024.
Residency and Race/Ethnicity Male % of M Female % of F NB/Other % of NBO N/R Total Total %
Nonresident Alien 115 68.5% 93 68.4% 1 20% 2 211 67.6%
Resident, Indigenous or Alaskan Native 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0 0%
Resident, Asian 5 3% 9 6.6% 1 20% 1 16 5.1%
Resident, Black or African American 3 1.8% 4 2.9% 0 0% 0 7 2.2%
Resident, Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 1 0.6% 0 0% 0 0% 0 1 0.3%
Resident, White 38 22.6% 21 15.4% 3 60% 0 62 19.9%
Resident, More than one Race Specified, non-Hispanic 4 2.4% 1 0.7% 0 0% 0 5 1.6%
Resident, Hispanic, any race 2 1.2% 8 5.9% 0 0% 0 10 3.2%
Total Residency & Ethnicity Known 168 136 5 3 312
Residency and/or Race/Ethnicity Unknown 16 28 1 3 48
Total 184 164 6 6 360

Table D14: PhD Applications and Acceptances to begin in 2024-2025 Academic Year, US CS Departments

PhD Applications

This data represents students who applied to a PhD program in the 2024-2025 academic year (therefore, students who applied during 2023-2024 academic year).
Gender # Depts International Domestic Total % International
Male 28,542 6,493 35,035 81.5%
Female 9,118 2,176 11,294 80.7%
Nonbinary/Other 96 118 214 44.9%
Total Known Gender 37,756 8,787 46,543 81.1%
Gender Unknown 3,254 870 4,124 78.9%
Total 101 41,010 9,657 50,667 80.9%

PhD Acceptances

This data represents students who were accepted to a PhD program in the 2024-2025 academic year.
Gender International Domestic Total % International
Male 2,931 1,031 3,962 74%
Female 1,010 426 1,436 70.3%
Nonbinary/Other 8 15 23 34.8%
Total Known Gender 3,949 1,472 5,421 72.8%
Gender Unknown 293 133 426 68.8%
Total 4,242 1,605 5,847 72.6%

New Enrollment, Gender by Residency

Please note that this table excludes those with unknown race/ethnicity, which is why totals may not align with the domestic numbers from the PhD Acceptances tab.
Gender International Domestic Total % International
Male 1,763 814 2,577 68.4%
Female 566 307 873 64.8%
Nonbinary/Other 2 9 11 18.2%
Gender Unknown 8 203 211 3.8%
Total 2,339 1,333 3,672 63.7%

PhD Applications of Resident Students, Breakdown by Gender & Race/Ethnicity

Please note that this table excludes those with unknown race/ethnicity, which is why totals may not align with the domestic numbers from the PhD Applications tab.
Gender Indigenous or Alaskan Native Asian Black Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander White More than one Race Hispanic Total % Black/ Indigenous/ Hispanic
Male 124 1396 163 103 1662 130 330 3,908 15.8%
Female 40 490 102 31 472 59 84 1,278 17.7%
Nonbinary/Other 0 17 6 1 33 5 2 64 12.5%
Not Available 0 101 14 0 105 14 19 253 13%
Total 164 2004 285 135 2272 208 435 5,503 16.1%

PhD Acceptances of Resident Students, Breakdown by Gender & Race/Ethnicity

This data represents students who were accepted to a PhD program in the 2024-2025 academic year.
Gender Indigenous or Alaskan Native Asian Black Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander White More than one Race Hispanic Total % Black/ Indigenous/ Hispanic
Male 2 209 29 1 398 34 0 875 3.5%
Female 1 94 24 0 147 15 15 395 10.1%
Nonbinary/Other 0 2 0 0 4 0 0 14 0%
Not Available 0 29 0 0 19 0 7 160 4.4%
Total 3 334 53 1 568 110 22 1,505 5.2%

New Enrollment of Resident Students, Breakdown by Gender & Race/Ethnicity

Gender Indigenous or Alaskan Native Asian Black Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander White More than one Race Hispanic Total % Black/ Indigenous/ Hispanic
Male 1 200 32 0 340 37 38 648 11%
Female 1 88 21 0 126 8 16 260 14.6%
Nonbinary/Other 0 1 0 0 5 0 1 7 14.3%
Gender Unknown 0 23 2 0 4 0 0 29 6.9%
Total 2 312 55 0 475 45 55 944 11.9%

Figure D1: PhD Production

Figure D2: Nonresident Aliens as Fraction of PhD Enrollments

Figure D2 shows the history of Non-resident Alien enrollment as a fraction of total doctoral enrollment with the decreases as reported here. 

Figure D3: PhD Degrees Granted by Tenure-Track Size

Figure D3 shows the relationship between doctoral degree production and department faculty size. The strata used for U.S. CS departments are described in the section on faculty salaries. Again this year, the figure indicates little relationship between doctoral degrees per tenure-track faculty and faculty size.

Figure D4: PhD Enrollment Normalized by Tenure-Track Size

U.S. CS departments with larger tenure-track faculty size tend to have larger doctoral enrollment per faculty member than do smaller sized departments. This relationship holds at both public and private institutions (Figure D4).

Figure D5: CS Pipeline Corrected for Year of Entry

Figure D5 shows a graphical view of the Ph.D. pipeline for U.S. computer science and Canadian departments, the main producers of CS doctoral degrees. The data in this graph are normalized by the number of reporting departments. The graph offsets the qualifier data by two years from the data for new students, and offsets the graduation data by five years from the data for new students. These data have been useful in estimating the timing of changes in production rates. The graph predicts increased Ph.D. production again next year. Indeed, all department types are forecasting increases in Ph.D. production (Table D1). However, based on past experience, the amount of the increase tends to be less than departments estimate.

Master’s Program Production and Enrollments

Table M1: Master’s degrees awarded by department type

This data represents Master’s degrees awarded during July 1, 2023 - June 30, 2024.
Dept. Type # Depts. CS Total CS % CE Total CE % I Total I % Total Total %
US CS Public 89 16,986 64.3% 424 41.9% 1,339 22.4% 18,749 56.1%
US CS Private 33 8,106 30.7% 49 4.8% 1,209 20.2% 9,364 28%
US CS Total 122 25,092 95% 473 46.7% 2,548 42.6% 28,113 84.1%
US CE 3 0 0% 447 44.1% 0 0% 447 1.3%
US Info 13 125 0.5% 0 0% 3,352 56.1% 3,477 10.4%
Canada 11 1,203 4.6% 93 9.2% 77 1.3% 1,373 4.1%
Total 149 26,420 100% 1,013 100% 5,977 100% 33,410 100%

Both the total number of master’s degrees produced (33,410) and the average per reporting department (224.2) are 17.6% lower compared to last year. Total Master’s degrees produced by U.S. CS departments at public institutions, which comprise the largest number of departments in the survey, decreased by 31% compared to US CS Public departments that reported last year (Table M1). Total CS and CE Master’s degrees produced across all departments decreased by 22.1% and 29.8% respectively compared to last year, but increased for US CS departments by 15.7 percentage points and Canadian departments by 6.6 percentage points. In comparison, the total production of I Master’s degrees across all departments increased by 15% compared to last year. Overall, the total and average per reporting department still represent the second-highest production levels in CRA Taulbee Survey history.

Table M2: Master’s degrees awarded by gender

This data represents Master’s degrees awarded during July 1, 2023 - June 30, 2024.
Gender CS Master’s Awarded CS % CE Master’s Awarded CE % I Master’s Awarded I % Total Total %
Male 17,634 71.1% 608 76.6% 2,916 50.6% 21,158 67.4%
Female 7,124 28.7% 186 23.4% 2,841 49.3% 10,151 32.4%
Nonbinary/Other 61 0.2% 0 0% 3 0.1% 64 0.2%
Total Known Gender 24,819 794 5,760 31,373
Unknown 1,601 219 217 2,037
Total 26,420 1,013 5,977 33,410

Overall, compared to 2023, the proportion of CS, CE, or I Master’s degrees of known gender earned by males increased by 3.2 percentage points, whereas the percentage of those earned by females decreased by 3.1 percentage points. However, Master’s degrees earned by female students in CS rose slightly to 28.7 from 26.8% last year, and for I Master’s degrees from 47.5 to 49.3% respectively compared to last year (Table M2). Percentage of Master’s degrees earned by male students in CS and I decreased by 2 percentage points and 1.8 percentage points respectively compared to last year, but increased for CE by 1.3 percentage points compared to last year. Similarly to last year, unknown gender only increased by approximately 0.8 percentage points (6.1 from 5.3%) from last year across all departments, with CE and I having larger percentage differentials than CS. 

Table M3: Master’s degrees awarded by ethnicity

This data represents Master’s degrees awarded during July 1, 2023 - June 30, 2024.
Residency and Race/Ethnicity CS Master’s Awarded CS % CE Master’s Awarded CE % I Master’s Awarded I % Total Total %
Nonresident Alien 16,221 68.6% 490 70.8% 3,543 64% 20,254 67.8%
Resident, Indigenous or Alaskan Native 136 0.6% 0 0% 3 0.1% 139 0.5%
Resident, Asian 3,021 12.8% 56 8.1% 464 8.4% 3,541 11.8%
Resident, Black or African American 266 1.1% 9 1.3% 192 3.5% 467 1.6%
Resident, Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 5 0% 0 0% 6 0.1% 11 0%
Resident, White 3,154 13.3% 102 14.7% 1,062 19.2% 4,318 14.4%
Resident, More than one Race Specified, non-Hispanic 287 1.2% 14 2% 115 2.1% 416 1.4%
Resident, Hispanic, any race 572 2.4% 21 3% 154 2.8% 747 2.5%
Total Residency & Ethnicity Known 23,662 692 5,539 29,893
Residency and/or Race/Ethnicity Unknown 2,758 11.7% 321 46.4% 438 7.9% 3,517 11.8%
Total 26,420 1,013 5,977 33,410

Among graduates whose residency and ethnicity is known, the proportion of CS master’s degrees that went to Nonresident Aliens increased by 8.4 percentage points.. CS and CE showed increases in the Nonresident Alien share of degrees, with the CS area’s increase being the largest at 8.4 percentage points. In aggregate across all areas, the increase was from 60.4 to 67.8%. The overall percentage of master’s recipients among the combined Indigenous/Alaska Native, Black/African-American, Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, Hispanic, and More than One Race Specified categories dropped to 6% from 7% in 2021-22. In CS it dropped from 6.8% to 5.3% percent. In I, it also dropped to 8.6% from 10%. Despite these decreases, it increased in CE to 6.3% from 4.4%. White students comprised 14.4% percent of the 2023-24 master’s graduates vs. 18.6% in 2022-23 (Table M3).

Table M4: Master’s degrees expected next year by department type

Dept. Type # Depts. CS Total CS % CE Total CE % I Total I % Total Total %
US CS Public 81 13,774 64.3% 338 61% 880 17.3% 14,992 55.4%
US CS Private 29 6,653 31.1% 26 4.7% 932 18.3% 7,611 28.1%
US CS Total 110 20,427 95.4% 364 65.7% 1,812 35.5% 22,603 83.5%
US CE 2 0 0% 126 22.7% 0 0% 126 0.5%
US Info 13 110 0.5% 0 0% 3,170 62.2% 3,280 12.1%
Canada 11 877 4.1% 64 11.6% 117 2.3% 1,058 3.9%
Total 136 21,414 100% 554 100% 5,099 100% 27,067 100%

An decrease in the production of master’s graduates is expected to happen this year. The CS area forecasts slightly lower degree production for 2024-25 than it experienced in 2023-24. CE also forecasts about half of the degree production of 2023-24 while the I area forecasts some increase for 2024-25 (Table M4).

Table M5: New Master’s students by department type

This data represents newly admitted Master’s students enrolled in Fall 2024.
Scroll horizontally to view additional columns and totals.
CS
CE
I
Total
Outside North America
Dept. Type CS Total CS # Depts. CS Avg. per. Dept. CE Total CE # Depts. CE Avg. per. Dept. I Total I # Depts. I Avg. per. Dept. Total # Depts. Avg. per. dept. # from Outside North America % from Outside North America
US CS Public 14,552 88 165.4 377 26 14.5 1,026 24 42.8 15,955 89 270.1 8,084 29.9%
US CS Private 6,462 32 201.9 27 6 4.5 742 10 74.2 7,231 32 344.3 3,788 14%
US CS Total 21,014 120 175.1 404 32 12.6 1,768 34 52.0 23,186 121 289.7 11,872 44%
US CE 0 0 NaN 287 3 95.7 0 0 NaN 287 3 130.7 105 0.4%
US Info 104 3 34.7 0 1 0.0 2,572 13 197.8 2,676 13 298.5 1,205 4.5%
Canada 702 11 63.8 25 1 25.0 117 1 117.0 844 11 107.5 339 1.3%
Total 21,820 134 162.8 716 37 19.4 4,457 48 92.9 26,993 148 273.7 13,521 50.1%

Overall, the average number of new Master’s students rose across all types of departments, including CS, CE, Info, and Canadian departments. Across all departments, average number of new Master’s students rose from 185.3 per department in 2022-23 to 273.7 students per department in 2023-24. Public CS departments saw an increase of new Master’s students, from 173.9 in 2022-23 to 270.1 average new Master’s students per public CS department in 2023-24. Private CS departments also rose from 244.7 in 2022-23 to 344.3 average new Master’s students per private CS department in 2023-2024 (Table M5).

Table M6: Total Master’s enrollment by department type

This data represents Master’s students enrolled on average last year between July 1, 2023 - June 30, 2024.
Dept. Type CS Total CS # Depts. CS Avg. per. Dept. CE Total CE # Depts. CE Avg. per. Dept. I Total I # Depts. I Avg. per. Dept. Total # Distinct Depts. Avg. per. dept.
US CS Public 29,841 88 339 816 17 48 3,223 18 179 33,880 89 381
US CS Private 20,481 34 602 109 3 36 3,233 7 462 23,823 34 701
US CS Total 50,322 122 412 925 20 46 6,456 25 258 57,703 123 469
US CE 0 0 NaN 748 3 249 0 0 NaN 748 3 249
US Info 328 2 164 0 0 NaN 8,138 14 581 8,466 14 605
Canada 2,246 11 204 251 1 251 88 1 88 2,585 11 235
Total 52,896 135 392 1,924 24 80 14,682 40 367 69,502 151 460

Overall enrollment for 2022-23 reported by this year’s master’s programs (Table M6) is similar to that reported in 2021-22 by last year’s master’s programs (this year’s reported enrollment is less than 1% lower than last year’s). The other department types each experienced increases in the average number of new master’s students per department (Table M6).

Table M7: Master’s degrees awarded by gender and ethnicity

Computer Science

This data represents Master’s degrees awarded during July 1, 2023 - June 30, 2024.
Residency and Race/Ethnicity Male % of M Female % of F NB/Other % of NBO N/R Total Total %
Nonresident Alien 11,049 66.7% 5,080 74.5% 51 85% 41 16,221 68.6%
Resident, Indigenous or Alaskan Native 5 0% 1 0% 0 0% 130 136 0.6%
Resident, Asian 2,078 12.5% 914 13.4% 1 1.7% 28 3,021 12.8%
Resident, Black or African American 174 1.1% 91 1.3% 1 1.7% 0 266 1.1%
Resident, Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 5 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 5 0%
Resident, White 2,576 15.6% 552 8.1% 6 10% 20 3,154 13.3%
Resident, More than one Race Specified, non-Hispanic 215 1.3% 68 1% 0 0% 4 287 1.2%
Resident, Hispanic, any race 460 2.8% 109 1.6% 1 1.7% 2 572 2.4%
Total Residency & Ethnicity Known 16,562 6,815 60 225 23,662
Residency and/or Race/Ethnicity Unknown 1,072 309 1 1,376 2,758
Total 17,634 7,124 61 1,601 26,420

Computer Engineering

This data represents Master’s degrees awarded during July 1, 2023 - June 30, 2024.
Residency and Race/Ethnicity Male % of M Female % of F NB/Other % of NBO N/R Total Total %
Nonresident Alien 365 67.8% 125 81.2% 0 NaN% 0 490 70.8%
Resident, Indigenous or Alaskan Native 0 0% 0 0% 0 NaN% 0 0 0%
Resident, Asian 51 9.5% 5 3.2% 0 NaN% 0 56 8.1%
Resident, Black or African American 6 1.1% 3 1.9% 0 NaN% 0 9 1.3%
Resident, Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 0 0% 0 0% 0 NaN% 0 0 0%
Resident, White 87 16.2% 15 9.7% 0 NaN% 0 102 14.7%
Resident, More than one Race Specified, non-Hispanic 12 2.2% 2 1.3% 0 NaN% 0 14 2%
Resident, Hispanic, any race 17 3.2% 4 2.6% 0 NaN% 0 21 3%
Total Residency & Ethnicity Known 538 154 0 0 692
Residency and/or Race/Ethnicity Unknown 70 32 0 219 321
Total 608 186 0 219 1,013

Information

This data represents Master’s degrees awarded during July 1, 2023 - June 30, 2024.
Residency and Race/Ethnicity Male % of M Female % of F NB/Other % of NBO N/R Total Total %
Nonresident Alien 1,942 69.6% 1,589 58.3% 0 0% 12 3,543 64%
Resident, Indigenous or Alaskan Native 3 0.1% 0 0% 0 0% 0 3 0.1%
Resident, Asian 177 6.3% 286 10.5% 1 33.3% 0 464 8.4%
Resident, Black or African American 97 3.5% 95 3.5% 0 0% 0 192 3.5%
Resident, Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 4 0.1% 2 0.1% 0 0% 0 6 0.1%
Resident, White 445 15.9% 609 22.3% 2 66.7% 6 1,062 19.2%
Resident, More than one Race Specified, non-Hispanic 55 2% 59 2.2% 0 0% 1 115 2.1%
Resident, Hispanic, any race 67 2.4% 87 3.2% 0 0% 0 154 2.8%
Total Residency & Ethnicity Known 2,790 2,727 3 19 5,539
Residency and/or Race/Ethnicity Unknown 126 114 0 198 438
Total 2,916 2,841 3 217 5,977

Table M8: Master’s enrollment by gender and ethnicity

As has been the case for several years, a larger proportion of female CS and CE degree recipients than male CS and CE degree recipients were Non-resident Alien, while a larger percentage of male CS and CE degree recipients than female CS and CE degree recipients were White (Table M7). In the I area, Non-resident Aliens again comprised a larger percentage of male master’s graduates than female master’s graduates, while a smaller percentage of male master’s graduates than female master’s graduates were White. These relationships are expected to continue into the near future based on the current enrollment breakdown by gender and ethnicity (Table M8).  It should be noted that a similar fraction of enrolled Master’s students reported this year has unknown/unreported residency and/or race/ethnicity compared with last year. (Table M8). Among the 70,086 enrolled master’s students among departments reporting for 2023-24, 13.8% had unknown/unreported residency and/or race/ethnicity, compared with 13.9% percent of the 2021-22 master’s students reported last year. Total unreported gender across enrolled Master’s students last year was 8.1%, which decreased this year to 5.6%.

Computer Science

This data represents Master’s students enrolled on average last year between July 1, 2023 - June 30, 2024.
Residency and Race/Ethnicity Male % of M Female % of F NB/Other % of NBO N/R Total Total %
Nonresident Alien 21,314 68.8% 10,377 75.3% 26 42.6% 83 31,800 70.4%
Resident, Indigenous or Alaskan Native 24 0.1% 5 0% 0 0% 187 216 0.5%
Resident, Asian 3,517 11.4% 1,600 11.6% 12 19.7% 28 5,157 11.4%
Resident, Black or African American 509 1.6% 303 2.2% 0 0% 3 815 1.8%
Resident, Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 16 0.1% 3 0% 0 0% 0 19 0%
Resident, White 4,278 13.8% 1,064 7.7% 16 26.2% 37 5,395 11.9%
Resident, More than one Race Specified, non-Hispanic 350 1.1% 113 0.8% 3 4.9% 2 468 1%
Resident, Hispanic, any race 976 3.2% 313 2.3% 4 6.6% 6 1,299 2.9%
Total Residency & Ethnicity Known 30,984 13,778 61 346 45,169
Residency and/or Race/Ethnicity Unknown 3,212 1,488 18 3,009 7,727
Total 34,196 15,266 79 3,355 52,896

Computer Engineering

This data represents Master’s students enrolled on average last year between July 1, 2023 - June 30, 2024.
Residency and Race/Ethnicity Male % of M Female % of F NB/Other % of NBO N/R Total Total %
Nonresident Alien 674 66.9% 238 80.4% 0 NaN% 0 912 69.9%
Resident, Indigenous or Alaskan Native 0 0% 0 0% 0 NaN% 0 0 0%
Resident, Asian 109 10.8% 17 5.7% 0 NaN% 0 126 9.7%
Resident, Black or African American 17 1.7% 6 2% 0 NaN% 0 23 1.8%
Resident, Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 0 0% 0 0% 0 NaN% 0 0 0%
Resident, White 153 15.2% 25 8.4% 0 NaN% 0 178 13.7%
Resident, More than one Race Specified, non-Hispanic 19 1.9% 3 1% 0 NaN% 0 22 1.7%
Resident, Hispanic, any race 36 3.6% 7 2.4% 0 NaN% 0 43 3.3%
Total Residency & Ethnicity Known 1,008 296 0 0 1,304
Residency and/or Race/Ethnicity Unknown 184 84 0 352 620
Total 1,192 380 0 352 1,924

Information

This data represents Master’s students enrolled on average last year between July 1, 2023 - June 30, 2024.
Residency and Race/Ethnicity Male % of M Female % of F NB/Other % of NBO N/R Total Total %
Nonresident Alien 4,515 64.9% 3,594 57.5% 1 4.5% 45 8,155 60.9%
Resident, Indigenous or Alaskan Native 10 0.1% 3 0% 0 0% 1 14 0.1%
Resident, Asian 563 8.1% 562 9% 1 4.5% 22 1,148 8.6%
Resident, Black or African American 261 3.8% 287 4.6% 3 13.6% 12 563 4.2%
Resident, Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 3 0% 3 0% 0 0% 0 6 0%
Resident, White 1,259 18.1% 1,453 23.3% 15 68.2% 74 2,801 20.9%
Resident, More than one Race Specified, non-Hispanic 93 1.3% 114 1.8% 2 9.1% 5 214 1.6%
Resident, Hispanic, any race 248 3.6% 231 3.7% 0 0% 13 492 3.7%
Total Residency & Ethnicity Known 6,952 6,247 22 172 13,393
Residency and/or Race/Ethnicity Unknown 315 519 20 435 1,289
Total 7,267 6,766 42 607 14,682

Figure M1: Master’s Degrees Granted by Tenure-Track Size

Figure M1 shows the master’s degrees granted per tenure-track faculty for the various department types. In U.S. CS departments, larger departments tend to produce more master’s degrees per faculty member.

Figure M2: Master’s Enrollment Normalized by Tenure-Track Size

Bachelor’s Program Production and Enrollments

Table B1: Bachelor’s degrees awarded by department type

This data represents Master’s students enrolled on average last year between July 1, 2023 - June 30, 2024.
Dept. Type # Depts. CS Total CS % CE Total CE % I Total I % Total Total %
US CS Public 87 28,993 70.9% 2,292 77.9% 2,190 35.5% 33,475 66.9%
US CS Private 31 7,888 19.3% 149 5.1% 764 12.4% 8,801 17.6%
US CS Total 118 36,881 90.2% 2,441 82.9% 2,954 47.9% 42,276 84.5%
US CE 2 0 0% 380 12.9% 0 0% 380 0.8%
US Info 12 444 1.1% 0 0% 3,210 52.1% 3,654 7.3%
Canada 10 3,569 8.7% 123 4.2% 0 0% 3,692 7.4%
Total 142 40,894 100% 2,944 100% 6,164 100% 50,002 100%

In 2023–24, Bachelor’s degree production fell 5.5% compared to the previous year across CS, CE, and I departments. Among departments reporting both years, the decrease was 4.3%. Despite this drop, production remains well above pre-pandemic levels and reflects continued strength following the post-2020 rebound. CS saw a 7.4% decrease and CE a 13.3% decrease. However, production in the I area was up 16% compared to last year. U.S. CS departments decreased overall production by 6%, and U.S. CE departments decreased likewise by 6.3%. U.S. I departments had a 15.4% increase in production and Canadian departments showed almost flat production with a 1 percent decrease. When assessing production per department, all department types showed decreases except I departments compared to last year, at 1% for U.S. CS, 7.9% percent for U.S. CE, and 1% for Canadian departments (Table B1). I departments showed growth in average Bachelor’s degree production per department, increasing by 25% this year to 304.5 from 243.38 last year.

Table B2: Bachelor’s degrees awarded by gender

This data represents Bachelor’s awarded during July 1, 2023 - June 30, 2024.
Gender CS Bachelor’s Awarded CS % CE Bachelor’s Awarded CE % I Bachelor’s Awarded I % Total Total %
Male 29,048 77% 2,449 83.5% 3,851 66.9% 35,348 76.1%
Female 8,621 22.8% 473 16.1% 1,902 33% 10,996 23.7%
Nonbinary/Other 66 0.2% 12 0.4% 7 0.1% 85 0.2%
Total Known Gender 37,735 2,934 5,760 46,429
Unknown 3,159 10 404 3,573
Total 40,894 2,944 6,164 50,002

Overall, compared to 2023, the proportion of CS, CE, or I Bachelor’s degrees of known gender earned by males decreased slightly by 0.5 percentage points, whereas the proportion of those earned by females increased slightly by 0.4 percentage points (Table B2). The proportion of Bachelor’s degrees earned by female students in CS rose slightly to 22.8% from 22.5% last year, and also rose for I Bachelor’s degrees from 32.5% to 33% respectively compared to last year. Bachelor’s degrees earned by male students in CS and I decreased by 0.3 and 0.5 percentage points respectively compared to last year, but increased for CE by 2.3 percentage points compared to last year. Similarly to last year, Bachelor’s degrees earned by unknown gender decreased by approximately 0.44 percentage points (7.15% from 7.59%) from last year across all departments, with CE having larger percentage differentials than CS and I. 

Table B3: Bachelor’s degrees awarded by ethnicity

This data represents Bachelor’s awarded during July 1, 2023 - June 30, 2024.
Residency and Race/Ethnicity CS Bachelor’s Awarded CS % CE Bachelor’s Awarded CE % I Bachelor’s Awarded I % Total Total %
Nonresident Alien 4,865 14.8% 204 9.6% 519 9.1% 5,588 13.7%
Resident, Indigenous or Alaskan Native 234 0.7% 3 0.1% 6 0.1% 243 0.6%
Resident, Asian 10,918 33.2% 671 31.6% 1,435 25.2% 13,024 32%
Resident, Black or African American 1,397 4.2% 94 4.4% 503 8.8% 1,994 4.9%
Resident, Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 26 0.1% 1 0% 5 0.1% 32 0.1%
Resident, White 10,869 33% 834 39.3% 2,256 39.6% 13,959 34.3%
Resident, More than one Race Specified, non-Hispanic 1,217 3.7% 92 4.3% 294 5.2% 1,603 3.9%
Resident, Hispanic, any race 3,379 10.3% 224 10.6% 676 11.9% 4,279 10.5%
Total Residency & Ethnicity Known 32,905 2,123 5,694 40,722
Residency and/or Race/Ethnicity Unknown 7,989 821 470 9,280
Total 40,894 2,944 6,164 50,002

Among graduates whose residency and ethnicity is known, the proportion of CS Bachelor’s degrees that went to Nonresident Aliens decreased slightly by 0.1 percentage points, with CE and I declining from last year 3.2 and 2.8 percentage points respectively in their proportion of degrees earned. In aggregate across all areas, the percentage point decrease was from 14.3% to 13.7%. The overall percentage of Bachelor’s recipients among the combined Indigenous/Alaska Native, Black/African-American, Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, Hispanic, and More than One Race Specified categories increased to 20% from 17.6% in 2022-23. In CS it increased from 16.8% to 19% percent. In I, it increased to 26.1% from 24.4%. White students comprised 34.3% percent of the 2023-24 Bachelor’s graduates vs. 37.5% in 2022-23 (Table B3), with the proportion being attained by White students decreasing by 3.5 percentage points compared to last year in CS and by 3.6 percentage points in I. Unreported race/ethnicity was similar in CS to that of last year, while in CE and I there was a sizeable increase this year in the percentage of graduates of unreported race/ethnicity (Table B3).

Table B4: Bachelor’s degrees expected next year by department type

Bachelor’s awarded refers to those awarded during July 1, 2023 - June 30, 2024.
Dept. Type # Depts. CS Total CS % CE Total CE % I Total I % Total Total %
US CS Public 84 29,407 70.2% 1,986 74.1% 1,508 30% 32,901 66.3%
US CS Private 28 7,769 18.5% 165 6.2% 484 9.6% 8,418 17%
US CS Total 112 37,176 88.7% 2,151 80.2% 1,992 39.6% 41,319 83.3%
US CE 2 0 0% 463 17.3% 0 0% 463 0.9%
US Info 12 463 1.1% 0 0% 3,042 60.4% 3,505 7.1%
Canada 8 4,273 10.2% 67 2.5% 0 0% 4,340 8.7%
Total 134 41,912 100% 2,681 100% 5,034 100% 49,627 100%

Table B5: New Bachelor’s students by department type

This data represents newly admitted Bachelor’s students enrolled in Fall 2024.
Scroll horizontally to view additional columns and totals.
CS
CE
I
Total
Dept. Type CS Majors CS Pre-majors CS # Depts. CS Avg. Majors per. Dept. CE Majors CE Pre-majors CE # Depts. CE Avg. Majors per. Dept. I Majors I Pre-majors I # Depts. I Avg. Majors per. Dept. Total Majors Avg. Majors per. dept.
US CS Public 35,998 8,321 87 429 2,575 1,477 26 103 3,102 149 23 135 41,675 490
US CS Private 7,331 3,165 28 282 168 23 8 24 410 16 4 102 7,909 304
US CS Total 43,329 11,486 115 394 2,743 1,500 34 86 3,512 165 27 130 49,584 447
US CE 0 0 1 NaN 430 0 2 215 0 0 0 NaN 430 215
US Info 326 271 3 163 0 0 0 NaN 2,042 688 12 186 2,368 215
Canada 4,181 1,031 10 418 234 0 1 234 0 0 0 NaN 4,415 442
Total 47,836 12,788 129 392 3,407 1,500 37 97 5,554 853 39 146 56,797 424

The 2024-25 cohort brought mixed news relative to changes in new undergraduate majors. In CS, the average number of new undergraduate majors per department increased 8.3%, from 362.1 to 392. The average number of I majors per department also increased from 107.5 to 146, for a change of 35.8% from 2023. 

In aggregate across all three areas, U.S. CS departments reported an increase in new majors per department of 12.8%, U.S. CE departments increased by 38.9%, and U.S. I departments increased by 25.1%. Canadian departments decreased by 15.7%. Within the U.S. CS departments, those in private institutions had an 18.2% decrease, while the increase among those in public institutions was just 21.3%. The overall increase in new majors per department aggregated across all department types and all areas was 10.9% (Table B5). 

Table 1 provides year-over-year comparisons based on the total number of new reported majors, without regard to the number of departments that reported. For departments that responded both years, the data shows a 9.9% increase in total new reported majors across all department types, and a 12.6% increase among U.S. CS departments.

Table B6: Total Bachelor’s enrollment by department type

This data represents Bachelor’s students were enrolled on average last year between July 1, 2023 - June 30, 2024.
CS
CE
I
Total
Dept. Type CS Majors CS Pre-majors CS # Depts. CS Avg. Majors per. Dept. CE Majors CE Pre-majors CE # Depts. CE Avg. Majors per. Dept. I Majors I Pre-majors I # Depts. I Avg. Majors per. Dept. Total Majors Avg. Majors per. dept.
US CS Public 139,268 18,672 86 1,638 9,392 2,719 36 376 13,296 452 24 554 161,956 1862
US CS Private 31,461 3,315 32 983 763 21 12 85 3,200 28 6 533 35,424 1107
US CS Total 170,729 21,987 118 1,459 10,155 2,740 48 299 16,496 480 30 550 197,380 1659
US CE 384 0 1 384 1,570 18 2 1,570 0 0 0 NaN 1,954 977
US Info 1,825 271 2 912 0 0 1 NaN 11,322 884 11 1,029 13,147 1195
Canada 21,172 2,594 11 1,925 1,192 1,192 2 1,192 0 0 0 NaN 22,364 2033
Total 194,110 24,852 132 1,482 12,917 3,950 53 359 27,818 1,364 41 678 234,845 1642

Across CS, CE, and I degrees, there was an increase in the total Bachelor’s enrollment in 2023-2024 by 6.6% across all departments, and a 12.5% increase of average majors per department. The only department types that experienced an overall decrease were Canadian departments, with a decrease in total enrolled majors across CS, CE, and I by 1.5% and a decrease in average majors per department by 10.4%.

When considering CS Bachelor’s enrollment, total CS enrollment aggregated across all department types increased by 7.3%. All department types exhibited increases in the average number of CS majors per department (Table B6), except Canadian departments with a slight decrease from 1,931.2 to 1,925 per department (0.3%).

In the I area, enrollment also increased in 2023-24. Total enrollment increased 16.9%, while the average number of I majors per reporting department increased by 22.5% When U.S. I departments alone are considered, the average number of I majors per department increases to 47.1%. 

In CE, total reported enrollment decreased by 18%, but the average number of majors per department increased by 16.9%. The CE values also are more strongly influenced by changes in the specific departments reporting from year to year.

Table B7: Bachelor’s degrees awarded by gender and ethnicity

The difference in total proportion of Computer Science Bachelor’s degrees awarded based on gender and race/ethnicity (Table B7) mostly stayed consistent from last year for different gender/racial/ethnic groups. The largest increase for proportions of degrees earned by male students was for Hispanic male students (1.3 percentage points). The largest decrease for proportions of degrees earned by male students was for White male students (3.6 percentage points). The largest increase for proportions of degrees earned by female students was for Hispanic female students (1.5 percentage points). The largest decrease for proportions of degrees earned by female students was for White female students (3.6 percentage points).

For Computer Engineering Bachelor’s degrees, there were also low differences compared to last year based on degrees earned by gender/race/ethnicity (Table B7). The largest increase for proportions of degrees earned by male students was for Black or African American students (1.3 percentage points) and for Hispanic students (1.3 percentages). The largest decrease in the proportion of degrees earned by male students was for White male students, with a 3 percentage point decrease. The largest increase for proportions of degrees going to female students was for female Nonresident Aliens, with an increase of 4.6 percentage points. The largest decrease in the proportion of degrees awarded to female students was for Hispanic female and White female students, with 2.1 and 2 percentage point decreases respectively.

For Information Bachelor’s degrees, there were also low differences compared to last year based on degrees earned by gender/race/ethnicity (Table B7). Similar to both Computer Science and Computer Engineering Bachelor’s degrees, the largest decrease in the proportion of degrees earned by male students was for White male students, with a 3.4 percentage point decrease. The largest increase in the proportion of Information Bachelor’s degrees earned by male students was for Asian male students, with a 2.5 percentage point increase. The largest decrease in the proportion of degrees earned by female students was for White female students, with a 6.3 percentage point decrease. The largest increase in the proportion of Information Bachelor’s degrees earned by female students was for Asian female students, with a 4.1 percentage point decrease.

Computer Science

This data represents Bachelor’s awarded during July 1, 2023 - June 30, 2024.
Residency and Race/Ethnicity Male % of M Female % of F NB/Other % of NBO N/R Total Total %
Nonresident Alien 3,568 14.1% 1,265 17% 6 10.9% 26 4,865 14.8%
Resident, Indigenous or Alaskan Native 188 0.7% 44 0.6% 0 0% 2 234 0.7%
Resident, Asian 7,856 31.1% 3,010 40.5% 10 18.2% 42 10,918 33.2%
Resident, Black or African American 1,017 4% 367 4.9% 2 3.6% 11 1,397 4.2%
Resident, Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 23 0.1% 2 0% 0 0% 1 26 0.1%
Resident, White 8,918 35.4% 1,820 24.5% 33 60% 98 10,869 33%
Resident, More than one Race Specified, non-Hispanic 943 3.7% 263 3.5% 2 3.6% 9 1,217 3.7%
Resident, Hispanic, any race 2,714 10.8% 653 8.8% 2 3.6% 10 3,379 10.3%
Total Residency & Ethnicity Known 25,227 7,424 55 199 32,905
Residency and/or Race/Ethnicity Unknown 3,821 1,197 11 2,960 7,989
Total 29,048 8,621 66 3,159 40,894

Computer Engineering

This data represents Bachelor’s awarded during July 1, 2023 - June 30, 2024.
Residency and Race/Ethnicity Male % of M Female % of F NB/Other % of NBO N/R Total Total %
Nonresident Alien 158 9% 46 12.8% 0 0% 0 204 9.6%
Resident, Indigenous or Alaskan Native 3 0.2% 0 0% 0 0% 0 3 0.1%
Resident, Asian 533 30.4% 136 38% 2 25% 0 671 31.6%
Resident, Black or African American 75 4.3% 19 5.3% 0 0% 0 94 4.4%
Resident, Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 0 0% 1 0.3% 0 0% 0 1 0%
Resident, White 716 40.8% 113 31.6% 4 50% 1 834 39.3%
Resident, More than one Race Specified, non-Hispanic 78 4.4% 12 3.4% 2 25% 0 92 4.3%
Resident, Hispanic, any race 193 11% 31 8.7% 0 0% 0 224 10.6%
Total Residency & Ethnicity Known 1,756 358 8 1 2,123
Residency and/or Race/Ethnicity Unknown 693 115 4 9 821
Total 2,449 473 12 10 2,944

Information

This data represents Bachelor’s awarded during July 1, 2023 - June 30, 2024.
Residency and Race/Ethnicity Male % of M Female % of F NB/Other % of NBO N/R Total Total %
Nonresident Alien 314 8.9% 188 10.7% 0 0% 17 519 9.1%
Resident, Indigenous or Alaskan Native 5 0.1% 1 0.1% 0 0% 0 6 0.1%
Resident, Asian 778 21.9% 577 32.9% 1 14.3% 79 1,435 25.2%
Resident, Black or African American 301 8.5% 171 9.7% 0 0% 31 503 8.8%
Resident, Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 3 0.1% 2 0.1% 0 0% 0 5 0.1%
Resident, White 1,553 43.8% 551 31.4% 6 85.7% 146 2,256 39.6%
Resident, More than one Race Specified, non-Hispanic 168 4.7% 106 6% 0 0% 20 294 5.2%
Resident, Hispanic, any race 425 12% 160 9.1% 0 0% 91 676 11.9%
Total Residency & Ethnicity Known 3,547 1,756 7 384 5,694
Residency and/or Race/Ethnicity Unknown 304 146 0 20 470
Total 3,851 1,902 7 404 6,164

Table B8: Bachelor’s enrollment by gender and ethnicity

This year, the fraction of the total CS bachelor’s enrollment in 2023-24 that is female increased from 23.1 percent to 23.8 percent of those whose gender was known. The difference in total proportion of Computer Science Bachelor’s enrollment based on gender and race/ethnicity (Table B8) mostly stayed consistent from last year for different gender/racial/ethnic groups. The largest increase for the proportion of CS enrollment of male students was for male Nonresident Alien students (1.2 percentage points). The largest decrease for the proportion of CS enrollment of male students was for White male students (2.5 percentage points). The largest increase for proportions of CS enrollment of female students was for female Nonresident Alien students (1.5 percentage points). The largest decrease for proportions of CS enrollment of female students was for White female students (2.1 percentage points). Resident Asians and Non-resident Aliens continue to comprise a larger fraction of female CS enrollment than male enrollment, while a larger fraction of male enrollment than female enrollment is White (Table B8a).

The fraction of the total CE Bachelor’s enrollment in 2023-24 that is female increased from 17.3 percent to 18.9 percent of those whose gender was known. The difference in total proportion of CE Bachelor’s enrollment based on gender and race/ethnicity (Table B8) mostly stayed consistent from last year for different gender/racial/ethnic groups. The largest increase for the proportion of CE enrollment of male students was for Asian male students (2.1 percentage points). The largest decrease for the proportion of CE enrollment of male students was for White male students (4.1 percentage points). The largest increase for proportions of CE enrollment of female students was for Asian female students (1.4 percentage points). The largest decrease for proportions of CE enrollment of female students was for White female students (2.2 percentage points). Resident Asians and Non-resident Aliens continue to comprise a larger fraction of female CE enrollment than male enrollment, while a larger fraction of male enrollment than female enrollment is White (Table B8b).

This year, the fraction of the total I bachelor’s enrollment in 2023-24 that is female increased from 25.5% to 29.9% of those whose gender was known. The difference in total proportion of I Bachelor’s enrollment based on gender and race/ethnicity (Table B8) mostly stayed consistent from last year for different gender/racial/ethnic groups. The largest increase for the proportion of I enrollment of male students was for male Asian male students (1.7 percentage points). The largest decrease for the proportion of I enrollment of male students was for White male students (4.1 percentage points). The largest increase for proportions of I enrollment of female students was for Black female students (3.3 percentage points). The largest decrease for proportions of I enrollment of female students was for White female students (6.4 percentage points). Resident Asians and Non-resident Aliens continue to comprise a larger fraction of female I enrollment than male enrollment, while a larger fraction of male enrollment than female enrollment is White (Table B8).

Computer Science

This data represents Bachelor’s students enrolled on average last year between July 1, 2023 - June 30, 2024.
Residency and Race/Ethnicity Male % of M Female % of F NB/Other % of NBO N/R Total Total %
Nonresident Alien 15,374 13.4% 5,282 14.7% 10 3.5% 639 21,305 13.9%
Resident, Indigenous or Alaskan Native 260 0.2% 67 0.2% 0 0% 1 328 0.2%
Resident, Asian 32,560 28.3% 12,931 35.9% 69 24.4% 495 46,055 30.1%
Resident, Black or African American 7,263 6.3% 2,895 8% 11 3.9% 78 10,247 6.7%
Resident, Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 107 0.1% 36 0.1% 0 0% 0 143 0.1%
Resident, White 39,211 34.1% 8,827 24.5% 138 48.8% 417 48,593 31.7%
Resident, More than one Race Specified, non-Hispanic 4,653 4% 1,514 4.2% 14 4.9% 54 6,235 4.1%
Resident, Hispanic, any race 15,635 13.6% 4,500 12.5% 41 14.5% 91 20,267 13.2%
Total Residency & Ethnicity Known 115,063 36,052 283 1,775 153,173
Residency and/or Race/Ethnicity Unknown 20,381 6,443 671 13,442 40,937
Total 135,444 42,495 954 15,217 194,110

Computer Engineering

This data represents Bachelor’s students enrolled on average last year between July 1, 2023 - June 30, 2024.
Residency and Race/Ethnicity Male % of M Female % of F NB/Other % of NBO N/R Total Total %
Nonresident Alien 857 9.7% 222 11.1% 3 9.1% 0 1,082 9.9%
Resident, Indigenous or Alaskan Native 12 0.1% 1 0% 0 0% 0 13 0.1%
Resident, Asian 2,577 29.1% 713 35.6% 11 33.3% 1 3,302 30.3%
Resident, Black or African American 553 6.2% 153 7.6% 2 6.1% 1 709 6.5%
Resident, Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 6 0.1% 2 0.1% 0 0% 0 8 0.1%
Resident, White 3,183 35.9% 526 26.2% 12 36.4% 3 3,724 34.1%
Resident, More than one Race Specified, non-Hispanic 365 4.1% 90 4.5% 1 3% 1 457 4.2%
Resident, Hispanic, any race 1,311 14.8% 297 14.8% 4 12.1% 1 1,613 14.8%
Total Residency & Ethnicity Known 8,864 2,004 33 7 10,908
Residency and/or Race/Ethnicity Unknown 1,533 427 7 42 2,009
Total 10,397 2,431 40 49 12,917

Information

This data represents Bachelor’s students enrolled on average last year between July 1, 2023 - June 30, 2024.
Residency and Race/Ethnicity Male % of M Female % of F NB/Other % of NBO N/R Total Total %
Nonresident Alien 1,346 7.4% 764 9.9% 1 1.7% 23 2,134 8.1%
Resident, Indigenous or Alaskan Native 27 0.1% 18 0.2% 0 0% 0 45 0.2%
Resident, Asian 3,866 21.2% 2,488 32.3% 10 16.9% 80 6,444 24.5%
Resident, Black or African American 1,907 10.4% 1,023 13.3% 5 8.5% 15 2,950 11.2%
Resident, Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 13 0.1% 5 0.1% 0 0% 1 19 0.1%
Resident, White 7,339 40.2% 2,123 27.5% 24 40.7% 97 9,583 36.5%
Resident, More than one Race Specified, non-Hispanic 954 5.2% 376 4.9% 7 11.9% 19 1,356 5.2%
Resident, Hispanic, any race 2,818 15.4% 914 11.9% 12 20.3% 13 3,757 14.3%
Total Residency & Ethnicity Known 18,270 7,711 59 248 26,288
Residency and/or Race/Ethnicity Unknown 959 501 2 68 1,530
Total 19,229 8,212 61 316 27,818

Table B9: Undergraduate representative course enrollments, department-level percentiles

Intro for Non-Majors

2024 # of Departments 25% 50% 75%
Number of Students in Course 104 95.8 171.0 431.2
% of Students Who Are CS Majors 82 0.0 6.1 48.1
% of Students Who Are Female 65 31.6 55.6 70.4
% of Students Who Are BHN 56 25.0 35.2 42.1

The Taulbee Survey also has been viewing enrollment using selected CS course level data. Such data was first reported in CRA’s Generation-CS report for the fall terms in 2005, 2010 and 2015. The Taulbee Survey began collecting follow-up data in the 2016 survey, and now does so annually. Table B9 provides data on four types of departmental courses: an introductory course for non-majors, an introductory course for majors, an intermediate level course, and an upper-level course. Departments select an appropriate course at their institution in each category; they are asked to provide the total enrollment in each of these courses, and the percentage enrollment within the course for majors and specific gender and race/ethnicity categories. The table shows the quartile values for the data reported by these departments. Compared to prior years, Table B9 only includes data from the 2023-2024 academic year. This is due to changes in reporting; these values should not be compared to prior years’ B9 table. We will return with longitudinal comparisons next year.

Intro for Majors

2024 # of Departments 25% 50% 75%
Number of Students in Course 110 175.8 335.5 597.0
% of Students Who Are CS Majors 90 41.6 54.5 77.8
% of Students Who Are Female 70 18.1 25.6 38.4
% of Students Who Are BHN 59 16.4 25.9 36.1

The Taulbee Survey also has been viewing enrollment using selected CS course level data. Such data was first reported in CRA’s Generation-CS report for the fall terms in 2005, 2010 and 2015. The Taulbee Survey began collecting follow-up data in the 2016 survey, and now does so annually. Table B9 provides data on four types of departmental courses: an introductory course for non-majors, an introductory course for majors, an intermediate level course, and an upper-level course. Departments select an appropriate course at their institution in each category; they are asked to provide the total enrollment in each of these courses, and the percentage enrollment within the course for majors and specific gender and race/ethnicity categories. The table shows the quartile values for the data reported by these departments. Compared to prior years, Table B9 only includes data from the 2023-2024 academic year. This is due to changes in reporting; these values should not be compared to prior years’ B9 table. We will return with longitudinal comparisons next year.

Mid-Level

2024 # of Departments 25% 50% 75%
Number of Students in Course 108 132.0 197.5 406.0
% of Students Who Are CS Majors 90 55.1 66.2 84.3
% of Students Who Are Female 70 16.3 20.4 28.3
% of Students Who Are BHN 59 11.8 20.4 27.4

The Taulbee Survey also has been viewing enrollment using selected CS course level data. Such data was first reported in CRA’s Generation-CS report for the fall terms in 2005, 2010 and 2015. The Taulbee Survey began collecting follow-up data in the 2016 survey, and now does so annually. Table B9 provides data on four types of departmental courses: an introductory course for non-majors, an introductory course for majors, an intermediate level course, and an upper-level course. Departments select an appropriate course at their institution in each category; they are asked to provide the total enrollment in each of these courses, and the percentage enrollment within the course for majors and specific gender and race/ethnicity categories. The table shows the quartile values for the data reported by these departments. Compared to prior years, Table B9 only includes data from the 2023-2024 academic year. This is due to changes in reporting; these values should not be compared to prior years’ B9 table. We will return with longitudinal comparisons next year.

Upper-Level

2024 # of Departments 25% 50% 75%
Number of Students in Course 107 78.5 152.0 327.0
% of Students Who Are CS Majors 88 61.9 71.8 83.8
% of Students Who Are Female 69 13.4 16.9 21.5
% of Students Who Are BHN 59 8.8 16.7 22.8

The Taulbee Survey also has been viewing enrollment using selected CS course level data. Such data was first reported in CRA’s Generation-CS report for the fall terms in 2005, 2010 and 2015. The Taulbee Survey began collecting follow-up data in the 2016 survey, and now does so annually. Table B9 provides data on four types of departmental courses: an introductory course for non-majors, an introductory course for majors, an intermediate level course, and an upper-level course. Departments select an appropriate course at their institution in each category; they are asked to provide the total enrollment in each of these courses, and the percentage enrollment within the course for majors and specific gender and race/ethnicity categories. The table shows the quartile values for the data reported by these departments. Compared to prior years, Table B9 only includes data from the 2023-2024 academic year. This is due to changes in reporting; these values should not be compared to prior years’ B9 table. We will return with longitudinal comparisons next year.

Figure B1: BS Production (CS & CE)

Figure B1 shows the trend in total CS and CE bachelor’s degree production since 1995 for all departments reporting to the Taulbee Survey. Based on department forecasts (Table B4), bachelor’s degree production in 2023-24 is expected to fall for the first time in quite a while. However, actual bachelor’s degree production tends to exceed departmental projections.

Figure B2: Newly Declared Undergraduate Majors: CS, CE, and I (beginning in 2008)

Figure B3: Bachelor’s Degrees Granted by Tenure-Track Size

Figure B4: Bachelor’s Enrollment Normalized by Tenure-Track Size

Figure B4 shows total enrollment per tenure-track faculty member for the various department types. In U.S. CS departments at private institutions, the larger departments have a lower enrollment per faculty member, while at public institutions, there is no clear relationship between enrollment per tenure-track faculty member and faculty size. The same observation was made last year.

Figure B5: Average New and Continuing CS Majors per Academic Unit (U.S. CS Programs Only)

Figure B5 shows the enrollment trend in U.S. CS departments from Taulbee Survey data since this surge began. It illustrates both the relatively flat number of average new majors per department from 2018 through 2021 followed by renewed growth in average new majors during the past three years, and the sixteen consecutive years of growth in average total majors per department through academic year 2023-24.

Faculty Demographics

Table F1: Actual and anticipated faculty size by position and department type

US CS Public

Please note that due to changes in data analysis, this table is not directly comparable to last year’s table.
Actual
Projected
2024-2025
2025-2026
2026-2027
Expected 2-Year Growth
# Depts
Role Total Avg Total* Avg* Total** Avg** Diff. % n
Tenure-Track Faculty 2464.2 36.8 2660.2 39.7 2801.2 41.8 337.0 13.7% 67
Teaching Professors 664.1 10.7 699.5 11.3 757.0 12.2 92.9 14% 62
Other Instructors 488.0 9.2 488.0 9.4 513.5 9.7 25.5 5.2% 53
Non-Tenure-Track Researcher Faculty 106.2 3.3 117.0 3.3 123.0 3.8 16.8 15.8% 32
Postdoctorates 153.5 4.3 171.5 4.8 195.0 5.4 41.5 27% 36
Total 3876.0 64.3 4136.2 68.5 4389.7 72.9 513.7 13.3%

US CS Private

Please note that due to changes in data analysis, this table is not directly comparable to last year’s table.
Actual
Projected
2024-2025
2025-2026
2026-2027
Expected 2-Year Growth
# Depts
Role Total Avg Total* Avg* Total** Avg** Diff. % n
Tenure-Track Faculty 1141.0 49.6 1208.4 52.5 1256.4 54.6 115.4 10.1% 23
Teaching Professors 288.1 14.4 308.1 15.4 325.1 16.3 37.0 12.8% 20
Other Instructors 146.2 9.1 146.2 10.6 180.0 11.2 33.8 23.1% 16
Non-Tenure-Track Researcher Faculty 107.0 8.9 111.0 8.9 112.0 9.3 5.0 4.7% 12
Postdoctorates 188.0 13.4 196.0 14.0 203.0 14.5 15.0 8% 14
Total 1870.3 95.4 1969.7 101.4 2076.5 105.9 206.2 11%

US CS Total

Please note that due to changes in data analysis, this table is not directly comparable to last year’s table.
Actual
Projected
2024-2025
2025-2026
2026-2027
Expected 2-Year Growth
# Depts
Role Total Avg Total* Avg* Total** Avg** Diff. % n
Tenure-Track Faculty 3605.1 40.1 3868.7 43.0 4057.7 45.1 452.6 12.6% 90
Teaching Professors 952.2 11.6 1007.6 12.3 1082.1 13.2 129.9 13.6% 82
Other Instructors 634.2 9.2 634.2 9.7 693.5 10.1 59.3 9.4% 69
Non-Tenure-Track Researcher Faculty 213.2 4.8 228.0 4.8 235.0 5.3 21.8 10.2% 44
Postdoctorates 341.5 6.8 367.5 7.4 398.0 8.0 56.5 16.5% 50
Total 5746.2 72.5 6106.0 77.2 6466.3 81.7 720.1 12.5%

US CE

Please note that due to changes in data analysis, this table is not directly comparable to last year’s table.
Actual
Projected
2024-2025
2025-2026
2026-2027
Expected 2-Year Growth
# Depts
Role Total Avg Total* Avg* Total** Avg** Diff. % n
Tenure-Track Faculty 0 NaN 0 NaN 0 NaN 0 NaN% 0
Teaching Professors 0 NaN 0 NaN 0 NaN 0 NaN% 0
Other Instructors 0 NaN 0 NaN 0 NaN 0 NaN% 0
Non-Tenure-Track Researcher Faculty 0 NaN 0 NaN 0 NaN 0 NaN% 0
Postdoctorates 0 NaN 0 NaN 0 NaN 0 NaN% 0
Total 0 NaN 0 NaN 0 NaN 0 NaN%

US Info

Please note that due to changes in data analysis, this table is not directly comparable to last year’s table.
Actual
Projected
2024-2025
2025-2026
2026-2027
Expected 2-Year Growth
# Depts
Role Total Avg Total* Avg* Total** Avg** Diff. % n
Tenure-Track Faculty 288.6 36.1 301.0 37.6 309.8 38.7 21.2 7.3% 8
Teaching Professors 158.6 19.8 167.2 20.9 174.2 21.8 15.6 9.8% 8
Other Instructors 23.0 3.8 23.0 7.8 47.0 7.8 24.0 104.3% 6
Non-Tenure-Track Researcher Faculty 4.8 1.2 6.0 1.2 6.0 1.5 1.2 25% 4
Postdoctorates 16.0 3.2 23.0 4.6 24.0 4.8 8.0 50% 5
Total 491.0 64.1 520.2 72.1 561.0 74.6 70.0 14.3%

Canadian

Please note that due to changes in data analysis, this table is not directly comparable to last year’s table.
Actual
Projected
2024-2025
2025-2026
2026-2027
Expected 2-Year Growth
# Depts
Role Total Avg Total* Avg* Total** Avg** Diff. % n
Tenure-Track Faculty 326.4 46.6 353.5 50.5 353.5 50.5 27.1 8.3% 7
Teaching Professors 40.8 13.6 41.7 13.9 42.7 14.2 1.9 4.7% 3
Other Instructors 34.0 8.5 34.0 8.5 31.0 7.8 -3.0 -8.8% 4
Postdoctorates 45.0 15.0 46.0 15.3 47.0 15.7 2.0 4.4% 3
Total 446.2 83.7 475.2 88.2 474.2 88.2 28.0 6.3%

Grand Total

Please note that due to changes in data analysis, this table is not directly comparable to last year’s table.
Actual
Projected
2024-2025
2025-2026
2026-2027
Expected 2-Year Growth
# Depts
Role Total Avg Total* Avg* Total** Avg** Diff. % n
Tenure-Track Faculty 4220.1 40.2 4523.3 43.1 4721.0 45.0 500.9 11.9% 105
Teaching Professors 1151.6 12.4 1216.4 13.1 1298.9 14.0 147.3 12.8% 93
Other Instructors 691.2 8.7 691.2 9.5 771.5 9.8 80.3 11.6% 79
Non-Tenure-Track Researcher Faculty 217.9 4.5 234.0 4.5 241.0 5.0 23.1 10.6% 48
Postdoctorates 402.5 6.9 436.5 7.5 469.0 8.1 66.5 16.5% 58
Total 6683.3 72.7 7101.4 77.7 7501.4 81.9 818.1 12.2%

Table F2: Vacant positions by position and department type

US CS Public

Role Tried to Fill # Unique Depts - Tried to Fill Filled # Unique Depts - Filled
Tenure-Track Faculty 310.0 70 266.0 69
Teaching Professors 123.5 52 106.5 52
Other Instructors 68.0 23 65.0 25
Non-Tenure-Track Researcher Faculty 25.0 4 29.0 7
Postdoctorates 52.5 18 65.5 23
Total 579.0 79 532.0 83

US CS Private

Role Tried to Fill # Unique Depts - Tried to Fill Filled # Unique Depts - Filled
Tenure-Track Faculty 103 27 113 28
Teaching Professors 38 13 82 13
Other Instructors 15 7 28 8
Non-Tenure-Track Researcher Faculty 8 4 16 5
Postdoctorates 38 10 41 10
Total 202 28 280 31

US CS Total

Role Tried to Fill # Unique Depts - Tried to Fill Filled # Unique Depts - Filled
Tenure-Track Faculty 413.0 97 379.0 97
Teaching Professors 161.5 65 188.5 65
Other Instructors 83.0 30 93.0 33
Non-Tenure-Track Researcher Faculty 33.0 8 45.0 12
Postdoctorates 90.5 28 106.5 33
Total 781.0 107 812.0 114

US CE

Role Tried to Fill # Unique Depts - Tried to Fill Filled # Unique Depts - Filled
Tenure-Track Faculty 6 2 4 2
Teaching Professors 1 1 1 1
Other Instructors 1 1 1 1
Non-Tenure-Track Researcher Faculty 0 0 0 0
Postdoctorates 0 0 0 0
Total 8 2 6 2

US Info

Role Tried to Fill # Unique Depts - Tried to Fill Filled # Unique Depts - Filled
Tenure-Track Faculty 38 11 35 10
Teaching Professors 20 9 18 9
Other Instructors 3 2 3 3
Non-Tenure-Track Researcher Faculty 0 0 0 0
Postdoctorates 21 4 23 5
Total 82 11 79 12

Canadian

Role Tried to Fill # Unique Depts - Tried to Fill Filled # Unique Depts - Filled
Tenure-Track Faculty 61 10 39 10
Teaching Professors 10 5 8 5
Other Instructors 6 3 2 2
Non-Tenure-Track Researcher Faculty 0 0 0 0
Postdoctorates 11 2 37 4
Total 88 11 86 11

Grand Total

Role Tried to Fill # Unique Depts - Tried to Fill Filled # Unique Depts - Filled
Tenure-Track Faculty 518.0 120 457.0 119
Teaching Professors 192.5 80 215.5 80
Other Instructors 93.0 36 99.0 39
Non-Tenure-Track Researcher Faculty 33.0 8 45.0 12
Postdoctorates 122.5 34 166.5 42
Total 959.0 131 983.0 139

Table F2a: Reasons positions left unfilled

Reasons # Reported
Didn’t find a person who met our hiring goals 25
Offers turned down 59
Technically vacant, not filled for administrative reasons 4
Hiring in progress 29
Other 5
Total 122

Table F1 shows the current (2024-25) and future anticipated sizes, in FTE, for tenure-track, teaching, and research faculty, and postdocs. Teaching faculty are separately reported in subcategories called Teaching professors and other instructors. Teaching professors on average have more varied responsibilities in teaching, scholarship, service/governance, etc., and higher expectations for visibility outside the unit or the institution. Other instructors are more focused on teaching introductory or mid-level courses and tend to have shorter contract lengths, though they are still full-time faculty (the Taulbee Survey does not collect data on course-by-course adjuncts other than typical stipends per course; see the section on faculty salaries).

The right hand column of Table F1 shows, for each row, the number of departments that provided non-zero values for actual 2024-2025 faculty in the particular category. This year, due to changes in data processing, these statistics are not comparable to last year’s statistics. They represent institutions that provided non-zero data across both their institution’s actual faculty sizes of 2024-2025 and projected faculty sizes for both 2025-2026 and 2026-2027.

Among U.S. CS departments, faculty sizes in private institutions are on average larger than those in public institutions in both tenure-track (49.6 for private and 36.8 for public) and total faculty size (95.4 for private and 64.3 for public). Canadian departments, on average, are larger than U.S. CS departments, in terms of both tenure-track and total faculty. Their average tenure-track faculty size exceeds that of U.S. CS departments in public institutions and is slightly smaller than that of U.S. CS departments in private institutions. U.S. I departments are similar in total faculty size to U.S. CS Public departments with US I 36.1 tenure track faculty and US CS Public at 36.8 tenure track faculty and similar total faculty sizes of 64.1 and 64.3 respectively. US I departments have more teaching professors than US CS public (19.8 in US I versus 10.7 in US CS Public), but US CS Public has more other instructors (3.8 in US I versus 9.2 in US CS public). When examining the size of I departments, it is important to note that we ask departments to report only computing-related faculty, so departments with Library Science programs may report only part of their faculty.

Table F2 summarizes faculty hiring this past year. We see many instances of departments hiring more faculty than they tried to fill. This can happen for a number of reasons—departmental leadership negotiating additional positions based on institutional incentives or departmental needs. In addition, we sometimes see Other Instructor hires increase over “Tried to Fill” metrics when tenure-track or teaching professor hires have not been filled and the departments need to hire to fulfill teaching demands. We report on both—average fill rates including the over 100% to reflect the actual performance of the department type’s hiring and topping the fill rates at 100% to equitably compare departments. Similar to last year, the top reason for positions left unfilled, as shown in Figure 2a, was that “offers were turned down” at 48.36% (down from 53% last year).

A total of 983 new hires were reported in aggregate across all department types this year– a 2.08% increase from last year’s 963 faculty hires. Departments were overall more successful in hiring faculty in all roles this year if we top out the fill rate at 100%. If we do not top out the fill rate at 100%, then overall, faculty hiring of other instructors was a bit less because this year departments had a fill rate of 106.45% and last year, the fill rate was 109.76%. US CS departments did better than last year in filling position openings in all roles with the highest percent changes in teaching professors at 34.67% (86.67% fill rate last year and 116.72% fill rate this year), 27.07% change in hiring non-tenure research faculty (107.32% fill rate last year and 136.36% fill rate this year), and 19.73% change hiring tenure track faculty (76.65% fill last year and 91.77% fill this year). Similar to last year, US CS private institutions had higher percentage fill rates–at over 100% for each role, whereas US CS public institutions had 85.81% fill rate for tenure track faculty, 86.23% fill rate for teaching professors, and 95.59% fill rate for other instructors.

US CE departments did not do as well as last year, however last year US CE departments had a 100% fill rate hiring 20 positions total, whereas this year, we see only 6 hires filling 8 positions and not filling two tenure track positions. US I departments had a success rate of 96.34% if we include the fill rates of over 100% and 93.9% if we top each fill rate at 100%–overall, US I schools were more successful at hiring this past year raising tenure track hiring from 81.48% fill rate to 92.11% fill rate and teaching professors raised 11.2 percentage points from last year. Canadian departments had a slightly higher success rate than last year at 69.32%—up from 55.9% last year and 68.8% reported two years ago. Canadian departments were successful at hiring postdoctorates–trying to fill 11 positions and hiring 37, whereas Canadian departments filled 63.93% of tenure track positions, 80% of teaching professor positions, and 33.3% of other instructors.

Table F3: Gender of newly hired faculty

Tenure-Track
Teaching Professors
Other Instructors
Researchers
Postdoctorates
Total
Gender TT TT % TP TP % OI OI % R R % PD PD % Total Total %
Male 327 71.9% 106 64.2% 54 72% 25 80.6% 115 74.2% 627 71.2%
Female 128 28.1% 58 35.2% 20 26.7% 6 19.4% 39 25.2% 251 28.5%
Nonbinary/Other 0 0% 1 0.6% 1 1.3% 0 0% 1 0.6% 3 0.3%
Total Known Gender 455 165 75 31 155 881
Gender Unknown 16 0 3 2 19 40
Total 471 165 78 33 174 921

When all categories of academic positions (tenure-track, teaching faculty, research faculty, and postdoc) are considered collectively in Table F3, the fraction of female hires was similar to last year at 28.5% (last year was 28.2% and 28.0% in 2022). For tenure-track positions, the percentage of female hires bounced back to 2022 rates at 28.1%, from 25.9% last year. The tenure-track percentage is 3.7 percentage points higher than the percentage of females among new PhDs produced during the last year (24.4%). This year, there was a decline in the number of women hired as teaching professors (down 4%) and as other instructors (down 1%).

Table F4: Ethnicity of newly hired faculty

Tenure-Track
Teaching Professors
Other Instructors
Researchers
Postdoctorates
Total
Residency and Race/Ethnicity TT TT % TP TP % OI OI % R R % PD PD % Total Total %
Nonresident Alien 83 22.9% 23 16.9% 11 19.3% 5 20.8% 34 27.6% 156 22.2%
Resident, Indigenous or Alaskan Native 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
Resident, Asian 151 41.6% 56 41.2% 12 21.1% 9 37.5% 46 37.4% 274 39%
Resident, Black or African-American, not Hispanic 4 1.1% 6 4.4% 5 8.8% 0 0% 2 1.6% 17 2.4%
Resident, Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander, not Hispanic 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
Resident, White, not Hispanic 115 31.7% 43 31.6% 27 47.4% 10 41.7% 40 32.5% 235 33.4%
Resident, More than One Race, not Hispanic 1 0.3% 2 1.5% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 3 0.4%
Resident, Hispanic or Latino, any race 9 2.5% 6 4.4% 2 3.5% 0 0% 1 0.8% 18 2.6%
Total Residency & Ethnicity Known 363 136 57 24 123 703
Residency and/or Race/Ethnicity Unknown 75 15 13 9 51 163
Total 438 151 70 33 174 866

White, Non-resident Alien and Asian hires collectively comprise 94.6% of those new tenure-track faculty whose residency is known. Since 2019’s percentage of 94.1, the percentage of White, Nonresident Alien, and Asian hires has fluctuated between 85 and 89%. Indigenous/Alaskan Native, Black/African-American, Hispanic, Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, and More than One Race collectively fell two percentage points from 7.1% last year to 5% this year. Tenure track faculty has the most noticeable increases with an 86.18% increase in hiring Nonresident Aliens (12.3% last year and 22.9% this year) and 15.27% increase in hiring Resident, White, not Hispanic (27.5% last year and 31.70% this year).

Table F5: Faculty losses

Reasons Number of Faculty # Depts
Died 9 37
Retired 93 81
Took Academic Position Elsewhere 99 72
Took Non-Academic Position 34 42
Switched to Part Time 13 31
Other 25 42
Unknown 5 28
Total 278 115

Faculty attrition decreased by approximately 20.34% compared to last year, representing 71 fewer faculty departures as shown in Table F5. Although the top two reasons for a loss were leaving for another academic position (99 losses) and retiring (93 losses), with the exception of death, all other reasons declined from last year’s numbers. Less losses were reported in the “other” category than last year.

Table F6: Gender of current faculty

Full
Associate
Assistant
Teaching Professors
Other Instructors
Researchers
Postdoctorates
Total
Gender Full Prof.  FP % Asso. Prof.  ASOP % Asst. Prof.  ASTP % TP TP % OI OI % R R % PD PD % Total Total %
Male 1,892 81% 1,104 76.8% 1,260 70.6% 961 68.4% 628 72.1% 223 72.9% 410 71.3% 6,478 74.3%
Female 443 19% 333 23.2% 520 29.1% 440 31.3% 242 27.8% 83 27.1% 164 28.5% 2,225 25.5%
Nonbinary/Other 0 0% 1 0.1% 4 0.2% 4 0.3% 1 0.1% 0 0% 1 0.2% 11 0.1%
Total Known Gender 2,335 1,438 1,784 1,405 871 306 575 8,714
Gender Unknown 71 25 42 25 54 7 78 302
Total 2,406 1,463 1,826 1,430 925 313 653 9,016

Table F6 disaggregates current faculty by gender for the various faculty types. Table F7 does likewise with respect to race/ethnicity. In aggregate across all faculty types, the proportion of current faculty who are female increased to 25.5%–up 5%, whereas males decreased 2%. Female faculty increased in percentage across all ranks with non-tenure-track researchers leading the way with a 22% increase followed by full and associate professors who increased by 5%. Meanwhile, with the exception of other instructors, male faculty slightly decreased across ranks (between 1-2%, except non-tenure-track researchers that decreased 6%). Nonbinary faculty decreased this year from 18 to 11 faculty members. The proportion of current faculty who are Indigenous/Alaskan Native, Black/African-American, Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, More than One Race, or Hispanic is 6.6% this year versus 6.8% last year. Similar to last year, the category of other instructors had the highest percentage at 9.7% (9.3% last year), while similar to last year postdocs had the lowest at 3.7% (3.6% last year). Asian faculty had the highest representation at the assistant professor rank at 43.5%. Nonresident Alien faculty had the highest representation as postdoctoral researchers at 30.1%. White and Black/African-American faculty had the highest representation as other instructors at 66.3% and 4.9%. Hispanic faculty had the highest representation as teaching professors.

Table F7: Ethnicity of current faculty

Full
Associate
Assistant
Teaching Professors
Other Instructors
Researchers
Postdoctorates
Total
Residency and Race/Ethnicity Full Prof.  FP % Asso. Prof.  ASOP % Asst. Prof.  ASTP % TP TP % OI OI % R R % PD PD % Total Total %
Nonresident Alien 27 1.3% 33 2.7% 254 17.1% 110 9.5% 45 6.1% 33 12.4% 132 30.1% 634 8.7%
Resident, Indigenous or Alaskan Native 1 0% 0 0% 4 0.3% 1 0.1% 2 0.3% 1 0.4% 1 0.2% 10 0.1%
Resident, Asian 660 33% 465 38.3% 647 43.5% 213 18.3% 131 17.9% 59 22.2% 156 35.6% 2,331 31.9%
Resident, Black or African-American, not Hispanic 27 1.3% 33 2.7% 30 2% 35 3% 36 4.9% 5 1.9% 6 1.4% 172 2.4%
Resident, Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander, not Hispanic 0 0% 13 1.1% 3 0.2% 2 0.2% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 18 0.2%
Resident, White, not Hispanic 1,227 61.3% 624 51.4% 486 32.6% 737 63.4% 485 66.3% 162 60.9% 134 30.6% 3,855 52.8%
Resident, More than One Race, not Hispanic 18 0.9% 17 1.4% 17 1.1% 11 0.9% 3 0.4% 1 0.4% 0 0% 67 0.9%
Resident, Hispanic or Latino, any race 41 2% 29 2.4% 48 3.2% 54 4.6% 30 4.1% 5 1.9% 9 2.1% 216 3%
Total Residency & Ethnicity Known 2,001 1,214 1,489 1,163 732 266 438 7,303
Residency and/or Race/Ethnicity Unknown 405 249 337 267 193 47 215 1,713
Total 2,406 1,463 1,826 1,430 925 313 653 9,016

Tables F8 and F9 provide gender x race/ethnicity crosstab data for current faculty. Table F8 shows, for each race/ethnicity category at each tenure-track faculty rank, the percentage of total male faculty at that rank represented by that race/ethnicity category, and the percentage of total female faculty at that rank represented by that category. Tables F9 respectively does likewise for teaching faculty, research faculty, and postdocs.

We continue to see at the full professor rank where the gender and ethnicity proportions are similar. Similar to last year, among tenure-track faculty, Asian faculty comprise a greater fraction of male assistant professors than female assistant professors, while White faculty comprise a greater percentage of female assistant professors than male assistant professors. With the exception of White and Hispanic teaching professors, men comprise a greater fraction of male teaching professors across all race and ethnicities.

Table F8: Current tenured and tenure-track faculty by gender and ethnicity

Full Professors

Residency and Race/Ethnicity Male % of M Female % of F NB/Other % of NBO N/R Total Total %
Nonresident Alien 20 1.2% 7 1.9% 0 NaN% 0 27 1.3%
Resident, Indigenous or Alaskan Native 0 0% 1 0.3% 0 NaN% 0 1 0%
Resident, Asian 537 33.1% 122 33.3% 0 NaN% 1 660 33%
Resident, Black or African American 22 1.4% 5 1.4% 0 NaN% 0 27 1.3%
Resident, Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 0 0% 0 0% 0 NaN% 0 0 0%
Resident, White 994 61.2% 222 60.7% 0 NaN% 11 1,227 61.3%
Resident, More than one Race Specified, non-Hispanic 17 1% 1 0.3% 0 NaN% 0 18 0.9%
Resident, Hispanic, any race 33 2% 8 2.2% 0 NaN% 0 41 2%
Total Residency & Ethnicity Known 1,623 366 0 12 2,001
Residency and/or Race/Ethnicity Unknown 269 77 0 59 405
Total 1,892 443 0 71 2,406

Associate Professors

Residency and Race/Ethnicity Male % of M Female % of F NB/Other % of NBO N/R Total Total %
Nonresident Alien 27 2.9% 6 2.1% 0 NaN% 0 33 2.7%
Resident, Indigenous or Alaskan Native 0 0% 0 0% 0 NaN% 0 0 0%
Resident, Asian 356 38.4% 109 38.2% 0 NaN% 0 465 38.3%
Resident, Black or African American 17 1.8% 14 4.9% 0 NaN% 2 33 2.7%
Resident, Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 9 1% 4 1.4% 0 NaN% 0 13 1.1%
Resident, White 484 52.2% 140 49.1% 0 NaN% 0 624 51.4%
Resident, More than one Race Specified, non-Hispanic 11 1.2% 6 2.1% 0 NaN% 0 17 1.4%
Resident, Hispanic, any race 23 2.5% 6 2.1% 0 NaN% 0 29 2.4%
Total Residency & Ethnicity Known 927 285 0 2 1,214
Residency and/or Race/Ethnicity Unknown 177 48 1 23 249
Total 1,104 333 1 25 1,463

Assistant Professors

Residency and Race/Ethnicity Male % of M Female % of F NB/Other % of NBO N/R Total Total %
Nonresident Alien 187 17.7% 67 15.5% 0 0% 0 254 17.1%
Resident, Indigenous or Alaskan Native 3 0.3% 1 0.2% 0 0% 0 4 0.3%
Resident, Asian 481 45.6% 166 38.4% 0 0% 0 647 43.5%
Resident, Black or African American 14 1.3% 16 3.7% 0 0% 0 30 2%
Resident, Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 2 0.2% 1 0.2% 0 0% 0 3 0.2%
Resident, White 316 30% 167 38.7% 2 100% 1 486 32.6%
Resident, More than one Race Specified, non-Hispanic 12 1.1% 5 1.2% 0 0% 0 17 1.1%
Resident, Hispanic, any race 39 3.7% 9 2.1% 0 0% 0 48 3.2%
Total Residency & Ethnicity Known 1,054 432 2 1 1,489
Residency and/or Race/Ethnicity Unknown 206 88 2 41 337
Total 1,260 520 4 42 1,826

Table F9: Current non-tenure-track faculty by gender and ethnicity

Teaching Professors

Residency and Race/Ethnicity Male % of M Female % of F NB/Other % of NBO N/R Total Total %
Nonresident Alien 63 7.9% 27 8% 0 0% 20 110 9.5%
Resident, Indigenous or Alaskan Native 1 0.1% 0 0% 0 0% 0 1 0.1%
Resident, Asian 122 15.2% 90 26.8% 1 100% 0 213 18.4%
Resident, Black or African American 21 2.6% 14 4.2% 0 0% 0 35 3%
Resident, Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 2 0.2% 0 0% 0 0% 0 2 0.2%
Resident, White 545 68% 188 56% 0 0% 1 734 63.3%
Resident, More than one Race Specified, non-Hispanic 6 0.7% 5 1.5% 0 0% 0 11 0.9%
Resident, Hispanic, any race 42 5.2% 12 3.6% 0 0% 0 54 4.7%
Total Residency & Ethnicity Known 802 336 1 21 1,160
Residency and/or Race/Ethnicity Unknown 159 104 0 4 267
Total 961 440 1 25 1,427

Other Instructors

Residency and Race/Ethnicity Male % of M Female % of F NB/Other % of NBO N/R Total Total %
Nonresident Alien 34 6.5% 11 5.4% 0 0% 0 45 6.1%
Resident, Indigenous or Alaskan Native 2 0.4% 0 0% 0 0% 0 2 0.3%
Resident, Asian 85 16.1% 46 22.7% 0 0% 0 131 17.9%
Resident, Black or African American 21 4% 15 7.4% 0 0% 0 36 4.9%
Resident, Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0 0%
Resident, White 360 68.3% 123 60.6% 1 100% 1 485 66.3%
Resident, More than one Race Specified, non-Hispanic 3 0.6% 0 0% 0 0% 0 3 0.4%
Resident, Hispanic, any race 22 4.2% 8 3.9% 0 0% 0 30 4.1%
Total Residency & Ethnicity Known 527 203 1 1 732
Residency and/or Race/Ethnicity Unknown 101 39 0 53 193
Total 628 242 1 54 925

Researchers

Residency and Race/Ethnicity Male % of M Female % of F NB/Other % of NBO N/R Total Total %
Nonresident Alien 22 11.6% 11 14.5% 0 NaN% 0 33 12.4%
Resident, Indigenous or Alaskan Native 0 0% 1 1.3% 0 NaN% 0 1 0.4%
Resident, Asian 41 21.6% 18 23.7% 0 NaN% 0 59 22.2%
Resident, Black or African American 4 2.1% 1 1.3% 0 NaN% 0 5 1.9%
Resident, Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 0 0% 0 0% 0 NaN% 0 0 0%
Resident, White 117 61.6% 45 59.2% 0 NaN% 0 162 60.9%
Resident, More than one Race Specified, non-Hispanic 1 0.5% 0 0% 0 NaN% 0 1 0.4%
Resident, Hispanic, any race 5 2.6% 0 0% 0 NaN% 0 5 1.9%
Total Residency & Ethnicity Known 190 76 0 0 266
Residency and/or Race/Ethnicity Unknown 33 7 0 7 47
Total 223 83 0 7 313

Postdoctorates

Residency and Race/Ethnicity Male % of M Female % of F NB/Other % of NBO N/R Total Total %
Nonresident Alien 98 31.8% 30 25.6% 0 NaN% 4 132 30.1%
Resident, Indigenous or Alaskan Native 0 0% 1 0.9% 0 NaN% 0 1 0.2%
Resident, Asian 108 35.1% 41 35% 0 NaN% 7 156 35.6%
Resident, Black or African American 4 1.3% 2 1.7% 0 NaN% 0 6 1.4%
Resident, Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 0 0% 0 0% 0 NaN% 0 0 0%
Resident, White 92 29.9% 40 34.2% 0 NaN% 2 134 30.6%
Resident, More than one Race Specified, non-Hispanic 0 0% 0 0% 0 NaN% 0 0 0%
Resident, Hispanic, any race 6 1.9% 3 2.6% 0 NaN% 0 9 2.1%
Total Residency & Ethnicity Known 308 117 0 13 438
Residency and/or Race/Ethnicity Unknown 102 47 1 65 215
Total 410 164 1 78 653

Table F10: Source of new faculty

Please note that sources may not be mutually exclusive.
Source Full Prof.  Asso. Prof.  Asst. Prof.  Teaching Prof.  Other Instructor Researchers Postdocs Total % Total from Source
New PhD 2 1 81 25 14 8 61 192 33.6%
Recent Postdoc 1 1 90 13 1 3 8 117 20.5%
Came from Another School 27 32 78 40 17 6 7 207 36.2%
Came from Industry 2 1 23 14 10 3 3 56 9.8%
Total 32 35 272 92 42 20 79 572
Hired without PhD 1 0 3 17 8 5 0 34
% Hired without PhD 3 0 1 18 19 25 0 6

Table F10 shows the sources of new faculty of each type. The fraction of newly hired assistant professors who had been postdocs in the previous year was 33%. Since we began collecting such information in 2015, this percentage has ranged from 21 to 31% so this year’s data is a record high. Similar to last year, just over 29% of new assistant professors were new PhDs and 28.68% of new assistant professors were in other academic positions the previous year, whereas only 8.46% of new assistant professors were from industry (down from 10.98 % last year). We do not know the previous academic rank of the new assistant professors who came from other academic positions; they might have been teaching faculty or research faculty as a transitional position, or they might have come from other tenure-track positions. 

This year, we have data about the previous position of 67 newly hired senior faculty, a similar number from last year of 61 new senior hires. Similar to last year–88.06% of this year’s new senior hires came from other academic institutions. Among newly hired teaching professors, 18% were hired without a PhD–the same as last year. This year, only 19% of other instructors were hired without a PhD–a decrease from 56% last year and 100% the year before. A quarter of new research faculty did not have a PhD–decreasing from 36 percent last year.

Figure F1: Comparative Change in Majors and Instructional Resources per U.S. CS Unit

Figure F1 illustrates the comparative changes at U.S. CS departments in undergraduate enrollment, tenure-track faculty and teaching faculty since 2006, when the current enrollment surge began. This figure updates, with recent years’ data, a figure from the Generation-CS report. The graph shows that teaching faculty increases during the past several years have approximately kept pace with enrollment growth. However, since the enrollment surge began, the cumulative growth in teaching faculty is just slightly more than half of the growth in majors. During the same period, tenure-track faculty size has increased by about 1/10 the rate of enrollment growth. For well over a decade, the gap between growth in tenure-track faculty and growth in undergraduate enrollment has been getting wider.

Research Expenditures

Table R1: Total expenditure from external sources for computing research

Percentile of Department Averages
Dept. Type # Depts 10% 25% 50% 75% 90%
US CS Public 68 1,580,969 3,024,281 6,582,971 14,239,438 23,139,453
US CS Private 22 1,817,389 3,562,477 9,484,503 22,024,259 39,328,144
US CS Total 90 1,682,471 3,020,502 7,951,874 15,459,434 24,548,543
US CE 2
US Info 13 2,474,967 5,169,483 6,302,746 8,147,712 27,096,028
Canada 7 2,440,800 4,927,777 7,605,422
Total 112 1,481,298 3,195,303 7,346,984 14,239,438 26,781,923

Table R1 shows the distribution of departments’ total research expenditure (including indirect costs or “overhead” as stated on project budgets) from external sources of support. Median research expenditures for 2023-2024 decreased over reported 2022-2023 levels at all institution types. The percentages of decrease were 6.57 (US Public), 5.67 (US Private), 12.22 (I), and 13.73% (Canadian). An insufficient number of CE departments reported expenditure information to allow for comparisons. Only CS Public had a noticeable difference in the number of reporting departments—68 this year and 74 last year, otherwise the number of reporting institutions only varied by 1. Since 2020, research expenditures have increased, however in Taulbee 2019-2020, we reported CS Public had a small 1.6% decrease and in 2018-2019, we reported large decreases across CS public (11 percent), US CS private (35 percent), and US I (28 percent). Thus, although these declines are concerning provided current events, we have seen larger decreases in median research expenditures in the recent past.

Figure R1: Research Expenditures Normalized by Tenure-Track Size

Figures R1 and R2 show the per capita expenditure, where capitation is computed two ways. The first (Figure R1) is relative only to the number of tenure-track faculty members. The second (Figure R2) is relative to research faculty and postdocs as well as tenure-track faculty. Canadian levels are shown in Canadian dollars.The U.S. CS data show a tendency for larger departments to have more external funding per capita than smaller departments when considering tenure-track size (Figure R1)–especially in private departments, however when we increase the number of researchers considered larger institutions do somewhat better, however there is little size-based difference otherwise (Figure R2). I includes both public and private institutions, however with the current number of departments included, we report them in aggregate. 

Figure R2: Research Expenditures Normalized by Tenure-Track + Research Faculty + Postdoctorates

Graduate Student Support

Table G1: Doctoral students supported as full-time students by department type

On Institutional Funds
On External Funds*
Total
Dept. Type # Dept Teaching Assistants Research Assistants Full-Support Fellows Computer Systems Other Teaching Assistants* Research Assistants* Full-Support Fellows* Computer Systems* Other* Total
US CS Public 82 4,421.1 1,517.4 364 4 33 126 4,145.5 253 23 1 10,888
US CS Private 29 688 1,004.9 457.4 0 143 34 1,429.4 219 0 137 4,112.6
US CS Total 111 5,109.1 2,522.2 821.4 4 176 160 5,574.8 472 23 138 15,000.6
US CE 2 82 3 75 0 0 0 395 10 0 3 568
US Info 13 338.8 201.3 54 0 13 0.2 218.2 17 0 3 845.6
Canada 7 273.1 257 4 0 0 0 225.7 7 0 0 766.8
Total 133 5,803 2,983.6 954.4 4 189 160.2 6,413.8 506 23 144 17,181

Table G1 shows the number of doctoral students supported as full-time students as of fall 2024, further categorized as teaching assistants (TAs), research assistants (RAs), and full-support fellows. The table also shows the split between those on institutional vs. external funds. Table G1a shows similar data for supported master’s students.

The average number of TAs on institutional funds among doctoral students in U.S. CS departments increased 3.64% this year, from 44.4 to 46.03. Similar to last year, the increase was due to departments in public institutions because average number of TAs on institutional funds among doctoral students per department at US CS Public TAs increased 7.44% (from 50.2 to 53.9), whereas US CS Private institutions decreased 4.28% from 24.8 to 23.7 (last year, private institutions’ change was flat). U.S. I departments reported a 8.12% decrease from last year’s large 27.7% increase. No comparisons are made for CE and Canadian departments due to the small number reporting.

Among externally funded RAs, the average number of doctoral students per U.S. CS department decreased for the second year in a row–this year, the decrease compared to last year was 6.44% from 53.7 to 50.2 externally funded RAs per department (last year, it decreased 3.1%). In US CS public institutions, the average decrease was 2.64% from 51.9 to 50.5 externally funded RAs per department, whereas in US CS private, the decrease was 17.37% from 59.6 to 49.3 externally funded RAs per department. This decrease in externally funded RAs is interesting when we triangulate the data with research expenditures (see R1), where private institutions have more total research expenditures. We acknowledge that the research expenditures and graduate student costs vary per institution and impact these numbers. We saw a 33.27% decrease in I external RAs (16.78 down from 25.2) from last year. For internal RAs, we see decreases in US CS (1.96% decrease in public–18.5 from 18.9; 17.62% decrease in private, 34.65 from 42.1), but an increase in I (11.34%–15.48 from 13.9).

For the fourth year in a row, the average number of US CS full-support fellows on internal and external funds increased compared with last year at a 4.72% increase. In US I departments, there was a 26.61% decrease in the average number of full-support fellows on internal and external funds–the largest hit coming from external fellowships with a 57.5% decrease (internal also decreased, but at 4.85%).

Aggregated across all department types independent of funding origin, 54.7% of funding goes to research assistants, 34.71% is allocated to teaching assistants, and 8.5% to fellows. Teaching assistantships increased by 5%–from 33.00% to 34.71%. Research assistantships decreased by 6%– from 58.48% to 54.70%. Fellowships remained flat at 8.5%. Although among US CS departments, private institutions still have a greater fraction of their students supported by RAs and full-support fellows (75.64% compared with 57.68%), this fraction is down 8% from last year. US CS public departments continue to fund more doctoral students at the teaching assistant level–41.76% compared with 38.81%. As we typically see for TAs, RAs, and full-support fellows, U.S. CS departments at private institutions and larger departments have higher median stipends than smaller departments. Similar to last year, in US CS public institutions, TA and RA stipends are higher in larger departments, however we see more variability in full support fellowships.

Table G1a: Master’s students supported as full-time students by department type

On Institutional Funds
On External Funds*
Total
Dept. Type # Dept Teaching Assistants Research Assistants Full-Support Fellows Computer Systems Other Teaching Assistants* Research Assistants* Full-Support Fellows* Computer Systems* Other* Total
US CS Public 67 1,630.7 159.8 13.5 63 274 2 442.3 6.5 5 0 2,596.7
US CS Private 19 603.5 19 10 25 8 5 74.7 13 0 0 758.2
US CS Total 86 2,234.2 178.8 23.5 88 282 7 516.9 19.5 5 0 3,354.9
US CE 2 32 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 42
US Info 12 276.2 10 2 9.8 20 0 70 0 0 2.5 390.4
Canada 7 308.1 205 0 0 0 0 178.6 0 0 0 691.7
Total 107 2,850.4 393.8 25.5 97.8 302 7 775.5 19.5 5 2.5 4,479

Among all supported master’s students aggregated across all department types, 63.80% are TAs–a 10% change compared with last year when 71% of master’s students were TAs. The percentage of RAs declined by 5% from 27.41% to 26.11%. Similar to last year, at US CS departments, TA support comprises a higher percentage than the aggregate, however this is mostly from US CS private institutions at 80.26% TA funding (but noticeably 7% down from last year). Canadian institutions have a higher percentage of master’s students funded as research assistants at 55.46%. All institution types, with the exception of CE although the total institutions reporting is too small for analysis, decreased the percentage of TA funded master’s students this year compared to last (3 to 13% decreases), whereas only US CS Public decreased RA funding of master’s students compared to last year (15% decrease).

Table G2: 2023-2024 Academic-Year Graduate Stipends by Department Type and Support Type

Teaching Assistantships

This data represents reported doctoral student stipends.
Dept. Type # Depts 10% 25% 50% 75% 90%
US CS Public 93 16,327.6 20,043 23,993 28,300 31,690.8
US CS Private 30 21,900 27,575 35,254 40,249.75 44,361
US CS Total 123 16,663.2 21,045.5 25,042 31,182.5 38,920
US CE 4 14,079
US Info 15 19,040 23,275 27,539 30,554.5 34,636.4
Canada 8 7,038.25 7,595 14,692.5
Total 150 13,675 20,148.75 25,000 30,954.25 38,640

Table G2 shows the distribution of stipends for TAs, RAs, and full support fellows. U.S. CS data is further broken down in this table by public and private institutions. Figures G1-G3 further break down the U.S. CS data by size of department and by geographic location of the university. Although median TA salaries at all US CS and I departments increased this year, we see smaller increases–4.32% in US CS public, 5.81% in US CS private, and 6% in US I. Similar to last year, US CS private institutions pay their TAs 46.93% more than public institutions. When comparing median TA salaries, US I school make almost 10% more than US CS total TA support, however with all salary data, US I is not normalized based on location which can impact salary comparisons. Canadian TA salaries saw a 5.18% decrease in median TA salaries.

Research Assistantships

This data represents reported doctoral student stipends.
Dept. Type # Depts 10% 25% 50% 75% 90%
US CS Public 92 18,000 21,661.5 24,638 28,115.5 31,087.8
US CS Private 34 26,620 29,525.25 38,315.5 40,892.25 44,137
US CS Total 126 19,350 22,985 26,535 32,229 40,166.5
US CE 4 14,079
US Info 15 19,040 23,275 27,539 30,554.5 34,636.4
Canada 8 13,180.25 16,067 18,461.25
Total 153 16,290.8 22,000 26,087 31,626 39,932

For RAs, median salaries at US CS institutions rose 3.78% at public institutions and 6.01% at private institutions–increasing, but a lower increase than last year (6.0 and 7.6 respectively). Similar to last year, median RA salaries at private institutions are 55.5% higher than at public departments. When comparing median salaries, RAs make more than TAs in US CS and Canadian with US CS Private leading at almost 8% more. US I make the same amount independent of assistantship type.

Full Support Fellows

This data represents reported doctoral student stipends.
Dept. Type # Depts 10% 25% 50% 75% 90%
US CS Public 52 18,400 24,697.25 30,000 34,000 35,094.5
US CS Private 29 28,856.6 33,300 38,131 40,800 45,000
US CS Total 81 23,382 28,124 32,850 37,000 41,308
US CE 2
US Info 11 24,300 27,769.5 30,000 34,197 37,000
Canada 6 19,808
Total 100 17,711.6 26,834.25 32,000 36,818.5 41,314.5

For full-support fellows, median salaries stayed flat at $30,000 for US CS public and increased by 3.15% for US CS private. US CS private institution full fellowships are 27.1% more than US CS public–increasing by 7 points from last year. Median US I full support fellowships increased 4.72% this year in comparison with last year, thus making them the same as US CS public. Canadian full fellowships had a 31% increase this year from $15,116 to $19,808).

Graduate Assistants for Computer Systems Support

This data represents reported doctoral student stipends.
Dept. Type # Depts 10% 25% 50% 75% 90%
US CS Public 35 0 4,612 17,235 23,701 27,147.2
US CS Private 10 0 5,726.75 17,340 32,037.5 38,221.6
US CS Total 45 0 4,500 17,280 24,500 29,320
US CE 1
US Info 7 0 12,150 22,043.5
Canada 1
Total 54 0 806 17,257.5 24,875 31,138.2

Figure G1: Teaching Assistantship Stipends

Figure G2: Research Assistantship Stipends

Figure G3: Full Support Fellows Stipends

Faculty Salaries

Table S1: Nine-month Salaries of faculty in US CS Departments, Responses from 120 departments

All Tenure-Track

Assistant Professors
Associate Professors
Full Professors
In rank 0-7 years In rank 8+ years In rank 0-7 years In rank 8-15 years In rank 16+ years
Departments 120 112 84 103 100 102
Individuals 1466 829 314 623 575 711
90 $152,282.00 $178,064.00 $177,003.00 $244,238.00 $251,381.00 $281,981.00
75 $142,164.00 $166,851.00 $160,016.00 $212,641.00 $228,828.00 $260,305.00
50 $128,980.00 $150,079.00 $142,076.00 $192,518.00 $202,130.00 $212,452.00
25 $116,845.00 $132,140.00 $130,968.00 $167,270.00 $174,729.00 $188,168.00
10 $107,378.00 $116,601.00 $118,224.00 $149,538.00 $157,598.00 $165,664.00

All Teaching or Other Faculty

Teaching Professors
Other Instructors
Postdocs
Researchers
In rank <3 years In rank 3-5 years In rank 6-8 years In rank 9+ years In rank <3 years In rank 3-5 years In rank 6-8 years In rank 9+ years
Departments 81 66 61 59 55 34 32 32 44 40
Individuals 374 199 152 253 221 134 83 129 378 217
90 $137,150.00 $140,988.00 $152,000.00 $164,069.00 $123,040.00 $133,960.00 $148,613.00 $136,136.00 $80,937.84 $182,924.00
75 $116,435.00 $128,575.00 $132,883.00 $146,561.00 $97,032.00 $117,104.00 $113,220.00 $121,771.00 $74,370.75 $142,829.00
50 $102,629.00 $110,915.00 $114,422.00 $125,112.00 $86,849.00 $95,364.00 $95,143.00 $98,108.00 $66,221.17 $110,642.00
25 $89,112.00 $92,110.00 $95,062.00 $100,987.00 $68,375.00 $81,308.00 $82,952.00 $78,848.00 $58,132.25 $89,411.00
10 $80,000.00 $78,684.00 $82,539.00 $89,320.00 $60,479.00 $70,305.00 $74,929.00 $56,852.00 $50,354.40 $74,345.00

Table S2: Nine-month Salaries of faculty US CS Public Departments, Responses from 88 departments

All Tenure-Track

Assistant Professors
Associate Professors
Full Professors
In rank 0-7 years In rank 8+ years In rank 0-7 years In rank 8-15 years In rank 16+ years
Departments 88 82 63 74 74 73
Individuals 1042 570 237 411 417 489
90 $145,776 $170,246 $167,990 $225,563 $244,111 $270,570
75 $134,126 $156,352 $157,982 $202,887 $221,715 $235,275
50 $125,416 $145,073 $140,400 $187,117 $197,250 $204,477
25 $112,391 $127,858 $128,469 $160,389 $174,507 $177,989
10 $106,095 $115,149 $117,825 $146,175 $153,975 $158,093

In U.S. CS departments, faculty salaries at private institutions continue to be higher than those at public institutions for nearly all faculty types (Tables S2, S3, and Box and Whisker Plots for US CS Department Salaries). Based on median salaries, faculty at private institutions make between 10.45% (full professors in rank 8-15 years) and 20% (full professors in rank 16+ years) more than faculty at public institutions.

All Teaching or Other Faculty

Teaching Professors
Other Instructors
Postdocs
Researchers
In rank <3 years In rank 3-5 years In rank 6-8 years In rank 9+ years In rank <3 years In rank 3-5 years In rank 6-8 years In rank 9+ years
Departments 60 47 42 42 41 24 25 27 31 30
Individuals 239 127 106 175 175 105 64 89 191 162
90 $129,472 $136,222 $150,003 $142,641 $108,265 $123,305 $116,329 $133,479 $74,457.00 $181,314
75 $111,384 $120,022 $128,519 $134,545 $91,538 $105,900 $101,156 $110,310 $70,376.00 $138,715
50 $97,219 $107,858 $113,129 $114,821 $82,326 $90,075 $89,800 $96,489 $63,989.00 $105,700
25 $86,065 $86,435 $87,671 $97,225 $66,300 $79,120 $78,900 $71,455 $57,782.50 $88,232
10 $78,560 $75,854 $76,886 $78,428 $58,705 $70,305 $68,137 $55,602 $47,464.00 $81,610

In U.S. CS departments, faculty salaries at private institutions continue to be higher than those at public institutions for nearly all faculty types (Tables S2, S3, and Box and Whisker Plots for US CS Department Salaries). Based on median salaries, faculty at private institutions make between 10.45% (full professors in rank 8-15 years) and 20% (full professors in rank 16+ years) more than faculty at public institutions.

Table S3: Nine-month Salaries of faculty US CS Private Departments, Responses from 32 departments

All Tenure-Track

Assistant Professors
Associate Professors
Full Professors
In rank 0-7 years In rank 8+ years In rank 0-7 years In rank 8-15 years In rank 16+ years
Departments 32 30 21 29 26 29
Individuals 424 259 77 212 158 222
90 $165,921 $183,747 $178,560 $261,574 $279,120 $291,631
75 $150,296 $177,397 $165,965 $227,477 $242,715 $273,890
50 $144,029 $167,464 $150,259 $208,408 $219,002 $250,125
25 $129,426 $156,129 $136,092 $180,290 $187,342 $212,553
10 $120,610 $135,630 $131,410 $163,475 $163,476 $185,972

When viewed relative to faculty size, CS salaries tend to be higher for larger departments in public institutions (best seen in Box and Whisker Plots) for all tenure-track and teaching ranks. Larger departments in private institutions typically have higher salaries except for full professors in rank 16+ years and associate professors in rank <=7 years where the median salary was higher. In addition, at private institutions, other instructors in position <=2 years had similar salaries independent of faculty size.

All Teaching or Other Faculty

Teaching Professors
Other Instructors
Postdocs
Researchers
In rank <3 years In rank 3-5 years In rank 6-8 years In rank 9+ years In rank <3 years In rank 3-5 years In rank 6-8 years In rank 9+ years
Departments 21 19 19 17 14 10 7 5 13 10
Individuals 135 72 46 78 46 29 19 40 187 55
90 $142,400 $146,201 $155,710 $170,801 $129,436 $138,443 NA NA $82,615.07 $186,111
75 $133,535 $133,269 $142,608 $166,050 $117,878 $126,628 $148,818 NA $81,115.20 $145,670
50 $115,119 $122,795 $128,879 $150,384 $100,801 $119,549 $130,500 $128,623 $76,522.33 $125,000
25 $110,002 $110,443 $106,810 $138,975 $93,045 $95,014 $111,170 NA $60,000.00 $110,477
10 $94,197 $103,174 $96,829 $108,680 $82,405 $77,321 NA NA $54,729.20 $74,055

When viewed relative to faculty size, CS salaries tend to be higher for larger departments in public institutions (best seen in Box and Whisker Plots) for all tenure-track and teaching ranks. Larger departments in private institutions typically have higher salaries except for full professors in rank 16+ years and associate professors in rank <=7 years where the median salary was higher. In addition, at private institutions, other instructors in position <=2 years had similar salaries independent of faculty size.

Table S4: Nine-month Salaries of faculty in US CS Public Departments with <= 15 Tenure-Track Faculty, Responses from 16 departments

All Tenure-Track

Assistant Professors
Associate Professors
Full Professors
In rank 0-7 years In rank 8+ years In rank 0-7 years In rank 8-15 years In rank 16+ years
Departments 16 11 7 8 7 5
Individuals 72 29 14 19 18 8
90 $124,032 $123,938 NA NA NA NA
75 $110,642 $121,418 $138,959 $174,887 $173,387 NA
50 $107,312 $115,116 $118,091 $154,215 $171,271 $202,214
25 $105,096 $110,791 $111,405 $137,860 $158,362 NA
10 $101,305 $106,101 NA NA NA NA

All Teaching or Other Faculty

Teaching Professors
Other Instructors
Postdocs
Researchers
In rank <3 years In rank 3-5 years In rank 6-8 years In rank 9+ years In rank <3 years In rank 3-5 years In rank 6-8 years In rank 9+ years
Departments 11 5 4 2 5 4 4 3 2 5
Individuals 25 7 6 5 6 8 7 6 4 26
90 $100,000 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
75 $90,144 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
50 $81,947 $83,497 $84,613 NA $62,639 $65,940 $79,037 NA NA $90,000
25 $76,840 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
10 $73,372 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

Table S5: Nine-month Salaries of faculty in US CS Public Departments with 10 < Tenure-Track Faculty <= 20, Responses from 19 departments

All Tenure-Track

Assistant Professors
Associate Professors
Full Professors
In rank 0-7 years In rank 8+ years In rank 0-7 years In rank 8-15 years In rank 16+ years
Departments 19 18 14 11 13 12
Individuals 108 63 36 26 35 36
90 $127,155 $147,626 $142,376 $195,595 $207,987 $209,322
75 $119,798 $141,197 $132,386 $187,649 $198,743 $202,708
50 $112,107 $128,239 $126,104 $170,695 $182,827 $185,364
25 $107,871 $120,709 $119,229 $161,177 $155,377 $170,666
10 $106,781 $114,053 $117,858 $152,986 $148,080 $148,021

All Teaching or Other Faculty

Teaching Professors
Other Instructors
Postdocs
Researchers
In rank <3 years In rank 3-5 years In rank 6-8 years In rank 9+ years In rank <3 years In rank 3-5 years In rank 6-8 years In rank 9+ years
Departments 13 10 7 7 11 5 4 5 3 4
Individuals 33 15 9 10 22 12 4 8 7 5
90 $103,897 $128,178 NA NA $96,879 NA NA NA NA NA
75 $96,674 $105,755 $102,951 $107,660 $73,563 NA NA NA NA NA
50 $88,524 $93,342 $84,000 $99,345 $64,500 $71,850 $82,913 $70,046 NA $102,322
25 $77,475 $75,246 $80,312 $79,650 $60,672 NA NA NA NA NA
10 $73,698 $71,094 NA NA $58,179 NA NA NA NA NA

Table S6: Nine-month Salaries of faculty in US CS Public Departments with 15 < Tenure-Track Faculty <= 25, Responses from 23 departments

All Tenure-Track

Assistant Professors
Associate Professors
Full Professors
In rank 0-7 years In rank 8+ years In rank 0-7 years In rank 8-15 years In rank 16+ years
Departments 23 22 17 18 20 20
Individuals 148 85 44 54 58 74
90 $128,867 $148,823 $147,550 $199,468 $208,783 $206,150
75 $124,304 $144,488 $136,676 $194,628 $199,124 $197,864
50 $117,966 $132,070 $130,973 $165,193 $178,856 $181,140
25 $110,605 $123,660 $124,918 $152,224 $160,180 $167,634
10 $106,532 $112,659 $117,044 $143,018 $147,145 $141,694

All Teaching or Other Faculty

Teaching Professors
Other Instructors
Postdocs
Researchers
In rank <3 years In rank 3-5 years In rank 6-8 years In rank 9+ years In rank <3 years In rank 3-5 years In rank 6-8 years In rank 9+ years
Departments 13 10 9 10 13 4 6 6 6 3
Individuals 36 14 9 17 34 9 11 11 15 6
90 $106,860 $109,863 NA $122,251 $96,068 NA NA NA NA NA
75 $101,443 $98,896 $121,546 $111,026 $80,740 NA NA NA NA NA
50 $91,566 $90,144 $93,059 $97,986 $66,300 $90,182 $82,333 $62,300 $65,138.00 NA
25 $88,524 $78,688 $82,539 $88,127 $61,197 NA NA NA NA NA
10 $77,863 $71,094 NA $71,531 $54,569 NA NA NA NA NA

Table S7: Nine-month Salaries of faculty in US CS Public Departments with 20 < Tenure-Track Faculty <= 35, Responses from 19 departments

All Tenure-Track

Assistant Professors
Associate Professors
Full Professors
In rank 0-7 years In rank 8+ years In rank 0-7 years In rank 8-15 years In rank 16+ years
Departments 19 18 14 17 16 19
Individuals 177 77 47 66 54 73
90 $129,655 $150,439 $159,484 $206,702 $217,389 $215,993
75 $126,512 $141,445 $153,747 $192,103 $192,596 $203,472
50 $119,063 $132,524 $134,421 $161,447 $172,687 $179,920
25 $112,845 $120,209 $122,386 $150,924 $161,708 $166,989
10 $105,537 $115,992 $110,438 $142,030 $148,696 $141,550

All Teaching or Other Faculty

Teaching Professors
Other Instructors
Postdocs
Researchers
In rank <3 years In rank 3-5 years In rank 6-8 years In rank 9+ years In rank <3 years In rank 3-5 years In rank 6-8 years In rank 9+ years
Departments 13 10 8 8 9 2 4 4 6 3
Individuals 58 21 13 22 24 3 9 6 13 7
90 $105,944 $109,062 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
75 $101,443 $94,122 $110,008 $100,692 $86,849 NA NA NA NA NA
50 $92,202 $82,312 $88,168 $93,466 $76,347 NA $64,695 $63,389 $61,994.50 NA
25 $86,500 $78,688 $76,012 $76,040 $61,197 NA NA NA NA NA
10 $75,289 $74,369 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

Table S8: Nine-month Salaries of faculty in US CS Public Departments with Tenure-Track Faculty >30, Responses from 44 departments

All Tenure-Track

Assistant Professors
Associate Professors
Full Professors
In rank 0-7 years In rank 8+ years In rank 0-7 years In rank 8-15 years In rank 16+ years
Departments 44 44 35 44 43 43
Individuals 766 431 162 318 328 394
90 $151,534 $178,585 $184,064 $242,618 $257,146 $283,403
75 $142,164 $166,573 $163,755 $216,815 $234,570 $256,550
50 $133,198 $154,835 $146,050 $197,493 $210,023 $222,057
25 $128,032 $145,144 $139,081 $182,460 $193,862 $202,022
10 $118,695 $134,728 $131,326 $163,669 $181,217 $174,401

All Teaching or Other Faculty

Teaching Professors
Other Instructors
Postdocs
Researchers
In rank <3 years In rank 3-5 years In rank 6-8 years In rank 9+ years In rank <3 years In rank 3-5 years In rank 6-8 years In rank 9+ years
Departments 32 29 28 28 19 15 14 16 22 22
Individuals 148 98 90 144 126 87 45 70 170 130
90 $140,415 $141,020 $155,155 $153,936 $119,364 $141,297 $139,492 $136,034 $74,710.80 $191,823
75 $123,252 $129,879 $132,912 $137,347 $98,582 $111,821 $110,669 $129,498 $72,513.82 $162,251
50 $107,718 $115,356 $115,350 $126,318 $88,461 $98,143 $100,815 $98,820 $63,178.97 $105,700
25 $94,826 $101,935 $104,274 $106,027 $83,294 $87,947 $90,657 $94,110 $55,990.37 $85,312
10 $86,687 $88,737 $88,176 $95,482 $76,044 $81,608 $84,310 $88,334 $47,709.90 $69,914

As has been the case in the recent past, teaching faculty at larger departments also tend to have higher salaries than those at smaller departments, however for teaching faculty in rank for 3-5 years at public institutions, the median salary decreases as the size of the faculty increases - to a low of $80,000 with a faculty size of 21–35 faculty until the faculty size is over 30 faculty where the salary jumps to $116,700. There is not enough data about research faculty and postdocs to do substantive analysis by department size.

Table S9: Nine-month Salaries of faculty in US CS Private Departments with <=20 Tenure-Track Faculty, Responses from 5 departments

All Tenure-Track

Assistant Professors
Associate Professors
Full Professors
In rank 0-7 years In rank 8+ years In rank 0-7 years In rank 8-15 years In rank 16+ years
Departments 5 3 3 4 1 3
Individuals 35 11 7 13 2 5
90 NA NA NA NA NA NA
75 NA NA NA NA NA NA
50 $136,903 NA NA $183,752 NA NA
25 NA NA NA NA NA NA
10 NA NA NA NA NA NA

All Teaching or Other Faculty

Teaching Professors
Other Instructors
Postdocs
Researchers
In rank <3 years In rank 3-5 years In rank 6-8 years In rank 9+ years In rank <3 years In rank 3-5 years In rank 6-8 years In rank 9+ years
Departments 3 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 0
Individuals 11 8 2 6 0 0 0 0 2 0
90 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
75 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
50 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
25 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
10 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

Table S10: Nine-month Salaries of faculty in US CS Private Departments with 15 < Tenure-Track Faculty <= 30, Responses from 12 departments

All Tenure-Track

Assistant Professors
Associate Professors
Full Professors
In rank 0-7 years In rank 8+ years In rank 0-7 years In rank 8-15 years In rank 16+ years
Departments 12 11 8 10 10 12
Individuals 93 48 19 25 38 62
90 $145,446 $175,410 NA $216,718 $236,780 $273,363
75 $144,304 $172,848 $143,914 $208,940 $218,755 $247,224
50 $137,087 $162,010 $139,726 $195,027 $202,759 $220,930
25 $129,141 $155,195 $135,865 $177,730 $179,152 $208,413
10 $124,349 $145,399 NA $174,001 $162,556 $189,190

All Teaching or Other Faculty

Teaching Professors
Other Instructors
Postdocs
Researchers
In rank <3 years In rank 3-5 years In rank 6-8 years In rank 9+ years In rank <3 years In rank 3-5 years In rank 6-8 years In rank 9+ years
Departments 8 9 11 6 5 1 1 0 2 2
Individuals 29 26 18 21 9 5 1 0 10 3
90 NA NA $144,778 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
75 $113,177 $129,158 $135,443 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
50 $105,049 $114,122 $110,987 $140,001 $96,602 NA NA NA NA NA
25 $93,973 $107,986 $104,582 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
10 NA NA $97,335 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

Table S11: Nine-month Salaries of faculty in US CS Private Departments with Tenure-Track Faculty >20, Responses from 27 departments

All Tenure-Track

Assistant Professors
Associate Professors
Full Professors
In rank 0-7 years In rank 8+ years In rank 0-7 years In rank 8-15 years In rank 16+ years
Departments 27 27 18 25 25 26
Individuals 389 248 70 199 156 217
90 $160,844 $187,788 $179,192 $264,368 $282,755 $294,728
75 $149,630 $177,419 $170,620 $227,477 $242,802 $273,855
50 $144,285 $167,587 $157,919 $212,282 $218,750 $248,976
25 $132,949 $156,612 $136,718 $186,655 $185,455 $213,453
10 $120,132 $134,762 $131,272 $164,828 $163,289 $187,256

All Teaching or Other Faculty

Teaching Professors
Other Instructors
Postdocs
Researchers
In rank <3 years In rank 3-5 years In rank 6-8 years In rank 9+ years In rank <3 years In rank 3-5 years In rank 6-8 years In rank 9+ years
Departments 18 16 17 16 14 10 7 5 12 10
Individuals 124 64 44 72 46 29 19 40 185 55
90 $142,910 $151,227 $157,597 $170,832 $129,436 $138,443 NA NA $82,711.59 $186,111
75 $136,246 $135,076 $144,778 $167,009 $117,878 $126,628 $148,818 NA $81,297.12 $145,670
50 $118,728 $128,228 $131,600 $155,517 $100,801 $119,549 $130,500 $128,623 $77,618.17 $125,000
25 $111,422 $113,670 $110,987 $143,903 $93,045 $95,014 $111,170 NA $65,334.00 $110,477
10 $97,727 $107,079 $96,323 $120,102 $82,405 $77,321 NA NA $54,489.60 $74,055

Table S12: Nine-month Salaries of faculty in US CS Public Departments in Large Cities or Suburbs, Responses from 39 departments

All Tenure-Track

Assistant Professors
Associate Professors
Full Professors
In rank 0-7 years In rank 8+ years In rank 0-7 years In rank 8-15 years In rank 16+ years
Departments 39 37 31 31 33 35
Individuals 483 289 129 194 188 241
90 $142,797 $167,248 $166,239 $235,184 $244,234 $264,523
75 $132,407 $152,522 $158,179 $208,392 $227,493 $224,720
50 $126,665 $144,930 $139,545 $190,454 $204,386 $202,878
25 $116,266 $132,251 $130,375 $158,822 $185,475 $173,651
10 $109,241 $120,948 $119,829 $146,622 $162,420 $162,625

All Teaching or Other Faculty

Teaching Professors
Other Instructors
Postdocs
Researchers
In rank <3 years In rank 3-5 years In rank 6-8 years In rank 9+ years In rank <3 years In rank 3-5 years In rank 6-8 years In rank 9+ years
Departments 23 20 19 19 20 10 12 13 15 14
Individuals 111 62 43 96 103 58 31 54 118 96
90 $121,887 $117,122 $132,632 $144,878 $110,127 $129,073 $145,095 $134,468 $73,304.68 $177,566
75 $106,912 $110,618 $121,773 $135,640 $96,966 $115,242 $113,220 $119,487 $69,233.00 $162,251
50 $98,616 $99,592 $112,843 $114,436 $88,230 $102,498 $98,958 $97,808 $63,475.00 $120,526
25 $86,460 $86,185 $88,168 $97,812 $73,562 $87,745 $82,030 $86,212 $57,782.50 $104,450
10 $78,995 $75,541 $77,783 $86,574 $65,670 $79,432 $74,929 $74,271 $53,750.46 $91,508

Table S13: Nine-month Salaries of faculty in US CS Public Departments in Midsize Cities or Suburbs, Responses from 20 departments

All Tenure-Track

Assistant Professors
Associate Professors
Full Professors
In rank 0-7 years In rank 8+ years In rank 0-7 years In rank 8-15 years In rank 16+ years
Departments 20 18 12 19 17 17
Individuals 199 106 38 103 108 115
90 $162,167 $178,665 $168,026 $220,957 $248,658 $281,065
75 $142,164 $161,479 $162,318 $203,580 $223,014 $263,809
50 $129,353 $146,041 $136,831 $192,103 $197,445 $204,546
25 $116,509 $131,969 $128,786 $171,421 $182,827 $189,604
10 $106,707 $110,425 $121,913 $152,119 $163,772 $169,041

All Teaching or Other Faculty

Teaching Professors
Other Instructors
Postdocs
Researchers
In rank <3 years In rank 3-5 years In rank 6-8 years In rank 9+ years In rank <3 years In rank 3-5 years In rank 6-8 years In rank 9+ years
Departments 14 10 9 9 7 5 4 5 4 5
Individuals 46 27 20 38 23 15 8 7 14 32
90 $140,035 $142,179 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
75 $114,226 $115,318 $128,246 $133,650 $82,473 NA NA NA NA NA
50 $98,031 $103,652 $115,496 $115,205 $80,500 $98,143 $88,402 $70,304 $72,376.00 $111,285
25 $91,725 $92,110 $112,491 $101,662 $65,514 NA NA NA NA NA
10 $90,168 $78,500 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

Table S14: Nine-month Salaries of faculty in US CS Public Departments in Small Cities, Towns, or Rural, Responses from 29 departments

All Tenure-Track

Assistant Professors
Associate Professors
Full Professors
In rank 0-7 years In rank 8+ years In rank 0-7 years In rank 8-15 years In rank 16+ years
Departments 29 27 20 24 24 21
Individuals 360 175 70 114 121 133
90 $140,095 $168,754 $161,931 $214,469 $236,112 $265,931
75 $133,919 $156,010 $152,596 $199,159 $216,545 $239,134
50 $118,405 $133,349 $145,440 $176,500 $187,990 $204,477
25 $107,000 $118,774 $125,262 $155,167 $168,434 $175,425
10 $102,784 $114,576 $115,199 $147,465 $148,120 $156,387

All Teaching or Other Faculty

Teaching Professors
Other Instructors
Postdocs
Researchers
In rank <3 years In rank 3-5 years In rank 6-8 years In rank 9+ years In rank <3 years In rank 3-5 years In rank 6-8 years In rank 9+ years
Departments 23 17 14 14 14 9 9 9 12 11
Individuals 82 38 43 41 49 32 25 28 59 34
90 $129,852 $141,040 $147,111 $138,145 $109,700 NA NA NA $72,293.73 $209,106
75 $111,834 $132,630 $131,815 $132,470 $85,757 $87,939 $93,227 $100,488 $67,249.75 $91,681
50 $95,288 $119,127 $104,004 $113,044 $70,750 $75,305 $84,539 $95,313 $62,614.47 $84,500
25 $80,974 $84,624 $82,904 $94,069 $61,557 $69,643 $78,900 $70,046 $49,224.75 $75,762
10 $75,495 $77,255 $75,479 $75,100 $52,454 NA NA NA $46,988.10 $64,640

Table S15: Nine-month Salaries of faculty in US CS Private Departments in Large Cities or Suburbs, Responses from 23 departments

All Tenure-Track

Assistant Professors
Associate Professors
Full Professors
In rank 0-7 years In rank 8+ years In rank 0-7 years In rank 8-15 years In rank 16+ years
Departments 23 21 16 21 17 20
Individuals 338 187 67 162 107 148
90 $164,905 $182,400 $179,476 $260,177 $306,022 $290,599
75 $150,199 $177,550 $167,517 $225,977 $242,802 $275,837
50 $144,285 $167,587 $150,268 $208,408 $218,750 $243,959
25 $136,678 $155,646 $134,670 $192,518 $193,002 $208,413
10 $120,621 $139,351 $131,180 $165,145 $163,664 $175,926

All Teaching or Other Faculty

Teaching Professors
Other Instructors
Postdocs
Researchers
In rank <3 years In rank 3-5 years In rank 6-8 years In rank 9+ years In rank <3 years In rank 3-5 years In rank 6-8 years In rank 9+ years
Departments 15 14 13 12 10 8 5 4 10 7
Individuals 113 60 37 63 31 24 17 36 164 50
90 $143,421 $154,578 $161,372 $165,655 $137,258 NA NA NA $84,279.10 NA
75 $135,342 $135,227 $150,767 $161,096 $117,878 $130,048 NA NA $80,967.40 $141,673
50 $122,040 $128,979 $133,868 $148,980 $108,000 $119,876 $130,500 $144,178 $72,376.17 $130,000
25 $111,217 $109,879 $110,987 $136,675 $95,400 $91,565 NA NA $57,484.50 $115,954
10 $96,533 $101,663 $104,331 $112,362 $86,815 NA NA NA $53,961.10 NA

Table S16: Nine-month Salaries of faculty in US CS Private in Other than Large Cities or Suburbs, Responses from 9 departments

All Tenure-Track

Assistant Professors
Associate Professors
Full Professors
In rank 0-7 years In rank 8+ years In rank 0-7 years In rank 8-15 years In rank 16+ years
Departments 9 9 5 8 9 9
Individuals 86 72 10 50 51 74
90 NA NA NA NA NA NA
75 $150,012 $176,939 NA $241,291 $242,455 $273,890
50 $139,650 $166,945 $140,855 $199,828 $219,255 $268,620
25 $128,456 $159,493 NA $178,964 $177,051 $216,153
10 NA NA NA NA NA NA

All Teaching or Other Faculty

Teaching Professors
Other Instructors
Postdocs
Researchers
In rank <3 years In rank 3-5 years In rank 6-8 years In rank 9+ years In rank <3 years In rank 3-5 years In rank 6-8 years In rank 9+ years
Departments 6 5 6 5 4 2 2 1 3 3
Individuals 22 12 9 15 15 5 2 4 23 5
90 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
75 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
50 $110,972 $113,927 $113,410 $169,888 $93,423 NA NA NA NA NA
25 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
10 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

Table S17: Nine-month Salaries of faculty in US Computer Engineering Departments, Responses from 3 departments

All Tenure-Track

Assistant Professors
Associate Professors
Full Professors
In rank 0-7 years In rank 8+ years In rank 0-7 years In rank 8-15 years In rank 16+ years
Departments 3 2 2 2 2 2
Individuals 42 26 5 30 21 34
90 NA NA NA NA NA NA
75 NA NA NA NA NA NA
50 NA NA NA NA NA NA
25 NA NA NA NA NA NA
10 NA NA NA NA NA NA

All Teaching or Other Faculty

Teaching Professors
Other Instructors
Postdocs
Researchers
In rank <3 years In rank 3-5 years In rank 6-8 years In rank 9+ years In rank <3 years In rank 3-5 years In rank 6-8 years In rank 9+ years
Departments 1 2 2 2 0 1 1 1 2 2
Individuals 4 9 6 5 0 1 1 2 9 4
90 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
75 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
50 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
25 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
10 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

Table S18: Nine-month Salaries of faculty in US Information Departments, Responses from 13 departments

All Tenure-Track

Assistant Professors
Associate Professors
Full Professors
In rank 0-7 years In rank 8+ years In rank 0-7 years In rank 8-15 years In rank 16+ years
Departments 13 12 12 10 10 8
Individuals 154 81 33 50 42 25
90 $135,424 $155,725 $163,755 $213,473 $205,222 NA
75 $130,349 $153,582 $154,648 $193,381 $198,002 $218,808
50 $117,771 $140,900 $137,576 $177,062 $183,056 $214,432
25 $110,544 $129,464 $125,480 $165,500 $171,666 $206,400
10 $107,760 $125,959 $118,740 $153,987 $168,936 NA

The median of the average salaries at U.S. I departments tends to be 2.79% (associate professors in rank <= 7 years) to 7.46% (full professors in rank 8-15 years) lower than those at U.S. CS public departments at all tenure-track faculty ranks except for full professor in rank for 16+ years where full professors in I schools make more than public school CS faculty. There is not enough data about CE departments to do substantive analysis by department size.

All Teaching or Other Faculty

Teaching Professors
Other Instructors
Postdocs
Researchers
In rank <3 years In rank 3-5 years In rank 6-8 years In rank 9+ years In rank <3 years In rank 3-5 years In rank 6-8 years In rank 9+ years
Departments 11 9 9 9 6 3 3 4 5 1
Individuals 60 51 26 40 14 4 5 5 21 5
90 $112,503 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
75 $102,105 $111,632 $107,445 $118,006 NA NA NA NA NA NA
50 $93,301 $95,516 $106,119 $110,250 $78,312 NA NA $89,580 $63,666.67 NA
25 $88,294 $91,565 $99,624 $97,501 NA NA NA NA NA NA
10 $87,410 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

The median of the average salaries at U.S. I departments tends to be 2.79% (associate professors in rank <= 7 years) to 7.46% (full professors in rank 8-15 years) lower than those at U.S. CS public departments at all tenure-track faculty ranks except for full professor in rank for 16+ years where full professors in I schools make more than public school CS faculty. There is not enough data about CE departments to do substantive analysis by department size.

Table S19: Twelve-month Salaries of faculty in Canadian Departments, Responses from 10 departments

All Tenure-Track

Assistant Professors
Associate Professors
Full Professors
In rank 0-7 years In rank 8+ years In rank 0-7 years In rank 8-15 years In rank 16+ years
Departments 10 10 9 10 9 9
Individuals 107 68 39 41 51 100
90 $188,766 $216,962 NA $254,220 NA NA
75 $176,849 $204,960 $202,678 $236,557 $239,500 $258,122
50 $153,059 $169,292 $199,327 $218,094 $224,835 $226,133
25 $129,520 $146,161 $196,374 $208,413 $195,987 $210,224
10 $123,812 $142,355 NA $193,640 NA NA

All Teaching or Other Faculty

Teaching Professors
Other Instructors
Postdocs
Researchers
In rank <3 years In rank 3-5 years In rank 6-8 years In rank 9+ years In rank <3 years In rank 3-5 years In rank 6-8 years In rank 9+ years
Departments 7 6 2 5 2 3 1 2 5 1
Individuals 22 14 6 32 4 8 3 5 74 4
90 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
75 $153,760 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
50 $127,136 $130,181 NA $162,515 NA NA NA NA $60,901.00 NA
25 $110,376 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
10 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

Table S20: Nine-month Salaries (Twelve-month for Canadian Departments) for New PhDs

Canadian Departments

Tenure-Track Professors Non-tenure-track Researchers Teaching Professors Other Instructors Postdocs
Departments 5 0 0 2 4
Individuals 16 0 0 7 28
90 NA NA NA NA NA
75 NA NA NA NA NA
50 $125,481 NA NA NA $59,159
25 NA NA NA NA NA
10 NA NA NA NA NA

For new PhDs in tenure-track positions at U.S. computer science, computer engineering, and I departments the median of the average 9-month salaries decreased 2.34% from $128,000 in 2023 (Department N = 50, Individual N = 137) to $125,000 in 2024 (Department N = 77, Individual N = 190) (Table S20). Since this data is across public and private CS departments and includes I departments, it is unclear if the overall salary is decreasing or only for specific types of departments. New PhDs in tenure-track positions in Canada saw a 12.86% decrease in median of the average 12-month salaries from $144,000 CDN (Department N = 4, Individual N = 6) to $125,481 CDN (Department N=5, Individual N=16). Last year, each salary increased by a little less than 1%. However, only two institutions reported such data, thus this is not representative of Canadian doctoral-granting institutions. New PhDs in postdocs all saw an increase in the U.S. and a 1.4% decrease in Canada.

US Departments

Tenure-Track Professors Non-tenure-track Researchers Teaching Professors Other Instructors Postdocs
Departments 77 5 39 15 29
Individuals 190 7 76 38 123
90 $145,013 NA $121,719 $114,900 $80,830
75 $134,150 NA $108,750 $105,765 $75,000
50 $125,000 $123,000 $96,000 $89,270 $70,000
25 $115,000 NA $85,835 $71,500 $58,400
10 $108,218 NA $75,000 $68,482 $50,595

For new PhDs in tenure-track positions at U.S. computer science, computer engineering, and I departments the median of the average 9-month salaries decreased 2.34% from $128,000 in 2023 (Department N = 50, Individual N = 137) to $125,000 in 2024 (Department N = 77, Individual N = 190) (Table S20). Since this data is across public and private CS departments and includes I departments, it is unclear if the overall salary is decreasing or only for specific types of departments. New PhDs in tenure-track positions in Canada saw a 12.86% decrease in median of the average 12-month salaries from $144,000 CDN (Department N = 4, Individual N = 6) to $125,481 CDN (Department N=5, Individual N=16). Last year, each salary increased by a little less than 1%. However, only two institutions reported such data, thus this is not representative of Canadian doctoral-granting institutions. New PhDs in postdocs all saw an increase in the U.S. and a 1.4% decrease in Canada.

Table S22: Median value for an adjunct teaching a single course

Group PhD teaching Undergrad. Course (Mdn) PhD teaching Undergrad. Course (# depts) PhD teaching Graduate Course (Mdn) PhD teaching Graduate Course (# depts) MS teaching Undergrad. Course (Mdn) MS teaching Undergrad. Course (# depts) MS teaching Graduate Course (Mdn) MS teaching Graduate Course (# depts)
US CS Public $7,200 63 $7,350 54 $7,077.5 58 $7,500 47
US CS Private $9,415 19 $10,000 17 $8,957.5 18 $9,250 16
US CS Total $7,623 82 $7,773 71 $7,375 76 $7,750 63
US CE 1 1 1 0
US Info $5,942 12 $5,942 12 $5,810.5 10 $5,884 9
Canada $7,894 4 $7,988 5 3 $8,494 4
Total $7,500 99 $7,773 89 $7,232 90 $7,625 76
Public large city $6,765 34 $6,515 30 $6,500 34 $7,350 26
Public midsize city $6,625 11 $7,200 9 $6,812.5 10 $8,600 8
Public small city, town, rural $8,000 19 $8,027.5 16 $7,500 15 $7,750 13
Private large city $9,415 13 $11,313 13 $9,415 13 $10,410 12
Private other $8,500 7 $7,500 5 $8,000 6 $7,500 5

Table S23: Adjunct rate adjustments

Dept. Type # Depts Yes - % Time at Department Yes - % Expertise Yes - % Other Factors
US CS Public 71 38.6% 36.2% 27.1%
US CS Private 23 65% 66.7% 43.8%
US CS Total 94 44.4% 43.3% 30.7%
US CE 1 100% 100% 100%
US Info 12 50% 41.7% 22.2%
Canada 5 40% 20% 0%
Total 112 45.4% 42.6% 28.9%

Figure S1: US CS Department Average Salary, Full Professor in Rank 16+ Years

Figure S2: US CS Department Average Salary, Full Professor in Rank 8-15 Years

Figure S3: US CS Department Average Salary, Full Professor in Rank 0-7 Years

Figure S4: US CS Department Average Salary, Associate Professor in Rank 8+ Years

Figure S5: US CS Department Average Salary, Associate Professor in Rank 0-7 Years

Figure S6: US CS Department Average Salary, Assistant Professor

Figure S7a: US CS Department Average Salary, Teaching Professor in Rank 9+ Years

Figure S7b: US CS Department Average Salary, Teaching Professor in Rank 6-8 Years

Figure S7c: US CS Department Average Salary, Teaching Professor in Rank 3-5 Years

Figure S7d: US CS Department Average Salary, Teaching Professor in Rank <=2 Years

Figure S7e: US CS Department Average Salary, Other Instructor in Rank 9+ Years

Figure S7f: US CS Department Average Salary, Other Instructor in Rank 6-8 Years

Figure S7g: US CS Department Average Salary, Other Instructor in Rank 3-5 Years

Figure S7h: US CS Department Average Salary, Other Instructor in Rank <=2 Years

Figure S8: US CS Department Average Salary, Researchers

Figure S9: US CS Department Average Salary, Postdoctorate

Teaching Loads

Table Prof1: Official teaching load of tenured and tenure-track faculty

Official Teaching Load*
Academic Calendar
Dept. Type # Depts* Minimum Mean Median Maximum # Depts Semester Quarter Other
US CS Public 78 1 3 3 8 83 74 9 0
US CS Private 30 0.7 2.9 2 8 30 24 5 1
US CS Total 108 0.7 2.9 3 8 113 98 14 1
US CE 2 2 3 3 4 2 2 0 0
US Info 12 2 3.4 3.5 4 13 10 2 1
Canada 9 2 3.1 3 4 10 7 0 3
Total 131 0.7 3 3 8 138 117 16 5

Across all departments, the median teaching load for tenured and tenure track faculty, as measured in semester courses per year, is 3.0. This median has not changed in many years and ranges between 2-3.5 depending on the department type (Table Prof1a). Similarly, the overall median teaching load for the teaching faculty and other instructors remained the same as that in 2021 at 6 semester courses per year (Tables Prof1b and Prof1c).

Table Prof1b: Official teaching load of teaching professors

Official Teaching Load*
Academic Calendar
Dept. Type # Depts* Minimum Mean Median Maximum # Depts Semester Quarter Other
US CS Public 69 0 5.4 6 12 83 74 9 0
US CS Private 25 0.7 4.8 5 8 30 24 5 1
US CS Total 94 0 5.2 6 12 113 98 14 1
US CE 1 4 4 4 4 2 2 0 0
US Info 12 4 6.2 6 11 13 10 2 1
Canada 6 6 6 6 6 10 7 0 3
Total 113 0 5.4 6 12 138 117 16 5

Table Prof1c: Official teaching load of other instructors

Official Teaching Load*
Academic Calendar
Dept. Type # Depts* Minimum Mean Median Maximum # Depts Semester Quarter Other
US CS Public 59 0 5.7 6 12 83 74 9 0
US CS Private 22 0.7 4.6 5 8 30 24 5 1
US CS Total 81 0 5.4 6 12 113 98 14 1
US CE 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 0 0
US Info 8 1 4.6 5 8 13 10 2 1
Canada 6 0 5 6 7 10 7 0 3
Total 96 0 5.2 6 12 138 117 16 5

Table Prof2: Faculty load reductions and increases

% of Respondents Where Faculty Load Reduction Possible
% of Respondents Where Faculty Load Increase Possible
Dept. Type # Depts - Tenured/Tenure-Track - Teaching Professors - Other Instructors - # Depts + Tenured/Tenure-Track + Teaching Professors + Other Instructors +
US CS Public 82 97.5% 46.8% 76.1% 76 69.9% 46.2% 41.9%
US CS Private 28 89.3% 38.1% 76% 23 52.2% 31.6% 33.3%
US CS Total 110 95.4% 44.6% 76% 99 65.6% 42.9% 40%
US CE 3 100% 66.7% 66.7% 3 66.7% 66.7% 66.7%
US Info 12 100% 71.4% 81.8% 13 53.8% 38.5% 40%
Canada 8 87.5% 66.7% 85.7% 7 85.7% 75% 66.7%
Total 133 95.5% 47.9% 76.9% 122 65.5% 44.2% 41.7%

Taulbee Survey also asks about the possibility of changes in teaching loads. Table Prof2 shows that, for all departments, while reductions in teaching load for tenured and tenure track faculty are possible in 95.5% of the responding academic units, this value was only 47.9% for teaching track faculty and 76.9% for other instructors. While comparatively less common, teaching load increases were possible in almost 69.9% of the responding departments for tenured and tenure track faculty, 46.2% for teaching track faculty and 41.9% for other instructors.

Table Prof3a: Types of load reductions possible in departments offering reductions - tenured/tenure track

Dept. Type # Depts Special Package for New Faculty Administrative Duties Type or Size of Class Taught Buy-out by % of salary Buy-out by dollar amount Strong Research Involvement Strong Course of Curriculum Involvement Other
US CS Public 79 84.8% 88.6% 32.9% 73.4% 21.5% 58.2% 43% 12.7%
US CS Private 25 76% 84% 24% 60% 8% 32% 40% 16%
US CS Total 104 82.7% 87.5% 30.8% 70.2% 18.3% 51.9% 42.3% 13.5%
US CE 3 100% 100% 33.3% 100% 0% 66.7% 0% 0%
US Info 12 75% 83.3% 8.3% 75% 16.7% 16.7% 33.3% 8.3%
Canada 7 100% 100% 28.6% 14.3% 28.6% 57.1% 42.9% 14.3%
Total 126 83.3% 88.1% 28.6% 68.3% 18.3% 49.2% 40.5% 12.7%

Tables Prof3a-Prof4c show the percentage of academic units selecting various reasons for teaching load changes. Similar to previous years, special packages for new faculty and administrative duties are the most frequently selected reasons for why tenured and tenure track faculty are provided with teaching load reductions. Administrative duties is the most frequently selected reason for teaching load reduction for teaching faculty and other instructors. Importantly, a greater percentage of academic units indicated buy-outs as a reason for teaching load reduction for all faculty compared to the results from the 2021 survey. The largest increases in the number units indicating buy-outs as a reason were observed for teaching track and other instructors although the percentage increased for tenured and tenure track faculty as well.

Table Prof3b: Types of load reductions possible in departments offering reductions - teaching professors

Dept. Type # Depts Special Package for New Faculty Administrative Duties Type or Size of Class Taught Buy-out by % of salary Buy-out by dollar amount Strong Research Involvement Strong Course of Curriculum Involvement Other
US CS Public 54 40.7% 74.1% 46.3% 31.5% 7.4% 22.2% 50% 9.3%
US CS Private 19 36.8% 68.4% 47.4% 36.8% 5.3% 15.8% 36.8% 15.8%
US CS Total 73 39.7% 72.6% 46.6% 32.9% 6.8% 20.5% 46.6% 11%
US CE 2 0% 50% 50% 0% 0% 0% 0% 50%
US Info 9 22.2% 88.9% 11.1% 55.6% 11.1% 0% 22.2% 0%
Canada 6 50% 100% 33.3% 16.7% 33.3% 16.7% 33.3% 16.7%
Total 90 37.8% 75.6% 42.2% 33.3% 8.9% 17.8% 42.2% 11.1%

Table Prof3c: Types of load reductions possible in departments offering reductions - other instructors

Dept. Type # Depts Special Package for New Faculty Administrative Duties Type or Size of Class Taught Buy-out by % of salary Buy-out by dollar amount Strong Research Involvement Strong Course of Curriculum Involvement Other
US CS Public 29 13.8% 41.4% 20.7% 10.3% 3.4% 3.4% 27.6% 17.2%
US CS Private 8 37.5% 50% 25% 37.5% 0% 12.5% 12.5% 25%
US CS Total 37 18.9% 43.2% 21.6% 16.2% 2.7% 5.4% 24.3% 18.9%
US CE 2 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 50%
US Info 5 20% 40% 20% 40% 0% 0% 40% 0%
Canada 2 50% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 50% 0%
Total 46 19.6% 43.5% 19.6% 17.4% 2.2% 4.3% 26.1% 17.4%

Table Prof4a: Reasons for increase in teaching load in departments where increase is possible - tenured or tenure-track faculty

Dept. Type # Depts Yes - Shifting Primary Responsibilities to Teaching Yes - Other
US CS Public 51 47.1% 52.9%
US CS Private 12 41.7% 58.3%
US CS Total 63 46% 54%
US CE 2 0% 100%
US Info 7 28.6% 71.4%
Canada 6 50% 50%
Total 78 43.6% 56.4%

Table Prof4b: Reasons for increase in teaching load in departments where increase is possible - teaching professors

Dept. Type # Depts Yes - Shifting Primary Responsibilities to Teaching Yes - Other
US CS Public 30 43.3% 56.7%
US CS Private 6 33.3% 66.7%
US CS Total 36 41.7% 58.3%
US CE 2 50% 50%
US Info 5 20% 80%
Canada 3 33.3% 66.7%
Total 46 39.1% 60.9%

Table Prof4c: Reasons for increase in teaching load in departments where increase is possible - other instructors

Dept. Type # Depts Yes - Shifting Primary Responsibilities to Teaching Yes - Other
US CS Public 26 46.2% 53.8%
US CS Private 6 33.3% 66.7%
US CS Total 32 43.8% 56.2%
US CE 2 50% 50%
US Info 4 50% 50%
Canada 2 50% 50%
Total 40 45% 55%

Space

Table Prof8: Department space, net square feet, all US (105 departments)

Percentile Total Space Faculty, Staff, and Student Offices Conference & Seminar Rooms Research Labs Instructional Labs
10% 15,087.2 6,802.7 587.8 1,241.5 797
25% 20,745 9,064 1,187.5 3,105.25 1,888
50% 36,439 12,811 2,400 6,602.5 4,159
75% 65,469 30,387.72 5,409.5 14,976 9,105
90% 115,043.2 47,196.9 10,150.2 21,703 14,539.7

Another set of questions asked every three years relates to the physical space that academic units have. Looking at all US departments, the total space in terms of square footage in each department has not changed significantly compared to what was reported three years ago. However, the median space for conference and seminar rooms, and research labs decreased slightly by approximately 15%; while the median space for instructional labs increased by 10%. Trends in changes in total space also varied based on department type with academic units in US CS Public institutions losing space slightly and those in US CS Private institutions gaining.

Table Prof9: Department space, net square feet, US CS public (69 departments)

Percentile Total Space Faculty, Staff, and Student Offices Conference & Seminar Rooms Research Labs Instructional Labs
10% 14,944 6,206.4 629 1,322 1,149.03
25% 20,745 7,756 1,112 4,004 2,402.5
50% 34,182 11,110 2,126 8,463 5,096.5
75% 68,148 30,922.5 5,103.1 18,378.5 9,939
90% 114,886.4 48,760 9,808.8 22,166 13,085.57

Table Prof10: Department space, net square feet, US CS private (22 departments)

Percentile Total Space Faculty, Staff, and Student Offices Conference & Seminar Rooms Research Labs Instructional Labs
10% 16,868.2 8,747 568.3 1,840 389.8
25% 19,482.75 10,590 1,378.5 2,396.5 974.5
50% 35,910.5 17,068 2,893.5 3,763 2,247
75% 56,975 30,000 4,981.25 6,983 4,907.25
90% 72,115.3 46,359 9,959.5 15,651.48 23,003

Table Prof11: Department space, net square feet, US CE (2 departments)

Percentile Total Space Faculty, Staff, and Student Offices Conference & Seminar Rooms Research Labs Instructional Labs
10%
25%
50%
75%
90%

Table Prof12: Department space, net square feet, US information (12 departments)

Percentile Total Space Faculty, Staff, and Student Offices Conference & Seminar Rooms Research Labs Instructional Labs
10% 17,088 9,970.4 1,183.9 1,322.1 863
25% 32,283.75 12,020 1,819.3 2,213.25 1,697
50% 46,381.5 24,877 3,367 3,932 3,698
75% 67,178.38 31,032.88 5,566.5 8,116.75 5,956.5
90% 110,287.2 36,980.15 8,566.8 16,472.98 9,022

Table Prof13: Department space, net square meters, Canadian (6 departments)

Percentile Total Space Faculty, Staff, and Student Offices Conference & Seminar Rooms Research Labs Instructional Labs
10%
25%
50% 7,432.1 2,682 490.6 1,584.8 1,213.7
75%
90%

Table Prof14: Definite plans to gain or lose

Dept. Type # Depts Gain Space No Change Lose Space
US CS Public 83 37.3% 61.4% 1.2%
US CS Private 26 26.9% 73.1% 0%
US CS Total 109 34.9% 64.2% 0.9%
US CE 2 0% 100% 0%
US Info 13 38.5% 61.5% 0%
Canada 9 44.4% 55.6% 0%
Total 133 35.3% 63.9% 0.8%

Academic units are also asked about any definite plans for gaining or losing space. Overall, 63.9% of all departments reported no planned changes in space while 35.3% expected to lose some space. These are similar to the results in 2021. For academic units adding space, the most frequently cited source for funding the additional space was institutional or private funds followed by state/provincial funding. The sources of funding also remained similar to those reported in 2021.

Table Prof15: Sources of funding for additional space

% Departments Adding Space Using Funds from Source
Dept. Type # Depts Institutional Federal State/Provincial Industry Private
US CS Public 91 29.7% 2.2% 13.2% 3.3% 12.1%
US CS Private 35 14.3% 0% 0% 0% 11.4%
US CS Total 126 25.4% 1.6% 9.5% 2.4% 11.9%
US CE 3 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
US Info 13 23.1% 0% 15.4% 0% 15.4%
Canada 11 18.2% 9.1% 9.1% 0% 9.1%
Total 153 24.2% 2% 9.8% 2% 11.8%

Table Prof16: Department space, net square feet per faculty member (tenured and tenure-track, or tenured and tenure-track plus research), all US CS (120 departments)

Total Space
Faculty, Staff, and Student Offices
Conference and Seminar Rooms
Research Labs
Instructional Labs
Percentile Total Space per TT Total Space per Fac. Office Space per TT Office Space per Fac. Conf./Sem. per TT Conf./Sem. per Fac. Res. Lab per TT Res. Lab per TT + Res Instr. Lab per TT Instr. Lab per TT + Teach
10% 565 316 202 135 22 12 49 39 20 15
25% 729 497 310 184 37 23 91 87 61 47
50% 1,082 696 404 262 66 45 220 217 121 82
75% 1,300 920 567 382 119 75 372 358 233 157
90% 2,168 1,145 767 528 167 113 471 452 333 232

Tables Prof16-Prof21 show the space reported by the academic units normalized for the number of faculty in each unit. Across all department types, there was a net reduction in the amount of space available per faculty member. This change is primarily due to increases in faculty size without a comparable change in total space available.

Table Prof17: Department space, net square feet per faculty member (tenured and tenure-track, or tenured and tenure-track plus research, US public CS (86 departments)

Total Space
Faculty, Staff, and Student Offices
Conference and Seminar Rooms
Research Labs
Instructional Labs
Percentile Total Space per TT Total Space per Fac. Office Space per TT Office Space per Fac. Conf./Sem. per TT Conf./Sem. per Fac. Res. Lab per TT Res. Lab per TT + Res Instr. Lab per TT Instr. Lab per TT + Teach
10% 564 322 202 127 23 12 51 51 26 20
25% 809 533 304 180 37 23 112 108 75 59
50% 1,093 701 406 261 75 48 262 241 152 90
75% 1,331 928 564 385 118 74 382 375 249 160
90% 2,180 1,146 753 525 158 107 510 466 328 231

Table Prof18: Department space, net square feet per faculty member (tenured and tenure-track, or tenured and tenure-track plus research) US private CS (34 departments)

Total Space
Faculty, Staff, and Student Offices
Conference and Seminar Rooms
Research Labs
Instructional Labs
Percentile Total Space per TT Total Space per Fac. Office Space per TT Office Space per Fac. Conf./Sem. per TT Conf./Sem. per Fac. Res. Lab per TT Res. Lab per TT + Res Instr. Lab per TT Instr. Lab per TT + Teach
10% 583 304 271 147 22 15 54 37 7 5
25% 632 405 331 206 39 24 73 62 23 17
50% 737 502 400 262 65 38 104 97 66 49
75% 1,178 855 577 379 128 75 185 169 144 94
90% 1,723 1,135 803 564 189 142 253 249 324 249

Table Prof19: Department space, net square feet per faculty member (tenured and tenure-track, or tenured and tenure-track plus research), US CE (2 departments)

Total Space
Faculty, Staff, and Student Offices
Conference and Seminar Rooms
Research Labs
Instructional Labs
Percentile Total Space per TT Total Space per Fac. Office Space per TT Office Space per Fac. Conf./Sem. per TT Conf./Sem. per Fac. Res. Lab per TT Res. Lab per TT + Res Instr. Lab per TT Instr. Lab per TT + Teach
10%
25%
50%
75%
90%

Table Prof20: Department space, net square feet per faculty member (tenured and tenure-track, or tenured and tenure-track plus research, US I (13 departments)

Total Space
Faculty, Staff, and Student Offices
Conference and Seminar Rooms
Research Labs
Instructional Labs
Percentile Total Space per TT Total Space per Fac. Office Space per TT Office Space per Fac. Conf./Sem. per TT Conf./Sem. per Fac. Res. Lab per TT Res. Lab per TT + Res Instr. Lab per TT Instr. Lab per TT + Teach
10% 738 362 321 154 37 24 18 18 11 12
25% 814 449 436 239 53 34 90 87 44 29
50% 1,417 714 509 354 84 51 105 105 87 49
75% 1,684 1,191 674 405 117 72 229 217 185 120
90% 1,992 1,648 737 621 145 163 309 309 249 175

Table Prof21: Department space, net square meters per faculty member (tenured and tenure-track, or tenured and tenure-track plus research), Canadian (10 departments)

Total Space
Faculty, Staff, and Student Offices
Conference and Seminar Rooms
Research Labs
Instructional Labs
Percentile Total Space per TT Total Space per Fac. Office Space per TT Office Space per Fac. Conf./Sem. per TT Conf./Sem. per Fac. Res. Lab per TT Res. Lab per TT + Res Instr. Lab per TT Instr. Lab per TT + Teach
10% 84 58 26 19 5 3 17 17 15 12
25% 98 67 37 28 5 3 18 17 21 16
50% 125 86 44 28 8 6 23 23 25 21
75% 216 204 46 30 10 6 45 45 26 23
90% 1,001 691 188 122 115 75 263 263 27 23

Departmental Support Staff

Table Prof23: Full time staff by type of support - all institutions

Secretarial / Administrative
Computer Support
Research
Percentile Admin Institutional Admin External Admin Total Comp. Sup. Institutional Comp. Sup. External Comp. Sup. Total Research Institutional Research External Research Total
10% 2 0 2 0.5 0 0.5 0 0 0
25% 3 0 3 1 0 1 0.5 0 1
50% 5.25 0 5.75 3 0 3 2 0.5 2
75% 11 0.875 11 5 0.5 5.75 4 4 5.5
90% 25 2.1 26.5 9.6 2 10 7 7.4 10.4
# Depts 126 30 126 105 31 106 85 41 87

Tables Prof23-Prof28 summarize the amount of staff support academic units reported having. Looking at all institutions, the results show a slight reduction in the total amount of staff support in general compared to 2021 with the largest reduction observed in administrative support staff. While the overall staff support has decreased, the institutional support for research staff has shown some increase. Despite the decreases, academic units reported the largest number of staff support in the administrative category.

Table Prof24: Full time staff by type of support - US CS public

Secretarial / Administrative
Computer Support
Research
Percentile Admin Institutional Admin External Admin Total Comp. Sup. Institutional Comp. Sup. External Comp. Sup. Total Research Institutional Research External Research Total
10% 1.102 0 1.102 0.5 0 0.5 0 0 0
25% 3 0 3 1 0 1 0.25 0 0.5
50% 4 0 4 2 0 2 1 0.25 2
75% 8 1 8.5 4 1.025 5 3 3 4
90% 13.4 2.3 13.4 6 3.2 7.2 5.7 8.6 9.1
# Depts 77 18 77 64 20 65 47 25 48

Table Prof25: Full time staff by type of support - US CS private

Secretarial / Administrative
Computer Support
Research
Percentile Admin Institutional Admin External Admin Total Comp. Sup. Institutional Comp. Sup. External Comp. Sup. Total Research Institutional Research External Research Total
10% 1.5 1.5 0.8 0.8 0 1
25% 3.25 3.25 1 1 1 0.5 1
50% 6.5 0 7 2 0 2 2 1 2
75% 10.75 10.75 6 6 5.5 3.5 6.5
90% 25.2 25.2 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.2
# Depts 26 6 26 19 5 19 18 7 19

Table Prof26: Full time staff by type of support - US CE

Secretarial / Administrative
Computer Support
Research
Percentile Admin Institutional Admin External Admin Total Comp. Sup. Institutional Comp. Sup. External Comp. Sup. Total Research Institutional Research External Research Total
10%
25%
50%
75%
90%
# Depts 2 2 2 2 2 1 2

Table Prof27: Full time staff by type of support - US information

Secretarial / Administrative
Computer Support
Research
Percentile Admin Institutional Admin External Admin Total Comp. Sup. Institutional Comp. Sup. External Comp. Sup. Total Research Institutional Research External Research Total
10% 6.2 6.2 0.1 0.1 0 0.1
25% 9.11 9.11 1.75 1.75 0.75 1.75
50% 12.5 12.5 5 0 5 2.815 1.29 4
75% 28.75 28.75 7.625 7.875 4.5 7.715
90% 40.6 40.6 8.9 9.9 8.178 10.766
# Depts 12 4 12 12 5 12 12 6 12

Table Prof28: Full time staff by type of support - Canadian

Secretarial / Administrative
Computer Support
Research
Percentile Admin Institutional Admin External Admin Total Comp. Sup. Institutional Comp. Sup. External Comp. Sup. Total Research Institutional Research External Research Total
10%
25% 5 5 4.375 4.375
50% 9 9 7.5 7.5 2 2.5
75% 16 16 18 18
90%
# Depts 9 2 9 8 1 8 6 2 6

Disability and Socioeconomic Data

Table 2a: Students with disability accommodations

Degree Level # Depts Reporting Accommodations with Enrollment Data Total Enrollment Total Students with Accommodations % of Enrollment with Accommodations % of Depts Reporting Zero Accommodations Max Dept % of Accommodations Average Number of Students with Accommodations per Dept
PhD 70 10,832 197 1.8 64.3 30.6 2.8
Masters 58 28,579 424 1.5 60.3 11.7 7.3
Bachelors 54 99,541 4,558 4.6 27.8 11.5 84.4

Since 2021, we collected the number of students at each degree level who received accommodations for disabilities during the past academic year, the number of undergraduate students who were first-generation college students, and the number who were recipients of Pell grants as shown in Table 2. This year, we had less departments report this data for all education levels– 10 percent less for doctoral, 25.86 percent less for master’s, and 11.11 percent less for bachelor’s. A few more departments reported on first-generation status and Pell grants this year.

For the third year in a row, Table 2a indicates that roughly 3/5 of the reporting departments showed no graduate students receiving disability accommodations, and that the average reporting department has between 1 and 2 percent of its graduate students receiving accommodations at both the master’s and doctoral levels. The doctoral and masters percentages are higher than last year– between 25-38 percent change, but still under 2 percent. We see a similar increase in the percent of enrollment with accommodations up 4.6 percent from 3.4 percent last year– a 35.29 percent change.

In those departments reporting information about Pell grants, for the second year in a row, the number of Pell recipients has increased from 23.4 percent to 25.2 percent– a 7.69 increase. Whereas for first generation college students, the opposite is true - for the second year in a row, enrollment percentages as first generation college students has decreased from 21.0 percent to 20.2 percent– a 3.81 percent decrease.

For the 69 departments reporting Pell grant information, the table disaggregates them into departments at public and private institutions. Since we started collecting data in 2021, we continue to see the trend that public institutions report a somewhat higher percentage of Pell grant students than do departments at private institutions and the percentages are higher than years past. This data will become more important in the future as we see potential budget impacts.

Table 2b: Undergraduate majors with Pell Grants and First Generation status

*Source: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS), Student Financial Aid component, provisional data (2022-23). Based on 5,423 institutions.
Status # Depts Reporting Enrollment with Status Data Total Enrollment Total Students with Status % of Enrollment with Status Overall NCES Pell Percent*
Pell Grant 69 109,290 27,591 25.2 31.6
First Generation 84 143,637 29,081 20.2

Table 2c: Undergraduate majors with Pell Grants based on Institution Type

*Source: Federal Pell Grant Program of the Higher Education Act: Primer, Congressional Research Service, AY 2019-2020. Updated Nov. 6, 2024. Using private not-for-profit numbers for comparison.
Status # Depts Reporting Enrollment with Status Data Total Enrollment Total Students with Status % of Enrollment with Status % Pell NCES, Dependent Student* % Pell NCES, Independent Student*
Pell Grant, US Public 54 95,004 24,245 25.5 44.2 27.8
Pell Grant, US Private 15 14,286 3,346 23.4 16.5 10.7

Conclusion

Academic units in computing fields are experiencing significant shifts in faculty demographics and student enrollment. Faculty sizes continue to increase across all categories especially in the teaching ranks where Teaching Professors and Other Instructors representation increased more than tenure track faculty and researcher ranks (Non-Tenure-Track Researchers and Postdocs) accounts for approximately 17% of department faculty (up from 9% last year). However, a critical trend is the widening gap between tenure-track faculty growth and burgeoning undergraduate enrollment, with tenure-track faculty increasing at about one-tenth the rate of enrollment growth, and teaching faculty at just over half. The overall tenure-track hiring success rate decreased this year.

While new bachelor’s majors increased for the fourth consecutive year (9.9% across all departments and 12.6% at U.S. CS departments). We see an increase in Pell grant recipients, particularly at public institutions, while first-generation college student enrollment percentages decreased. Overall bachelor’s and master’s degree production experienced decreases this year (5.5% and 17.6% respectively). Despite these drops, production remains above pre-pandemic levels for bachelor’s degrees and represents the second-highest in history for master’s degrees. Total reported enrollment in the CS major also continued to grow by 7.5%.

The landscape of doctoral programs reveals progress. Doctoral degree production reached an all-time high of 2,352 PhDs awarded, an 8.2% increase from the previous year. New PhD recipients are increasingly taking academic jobs in North America (38.7%, up from 30.6%). Industry continues to be a strong draw for new PhD recipients, however slightly less new PhDs started jobs in industry this year (54.3%, down from 57.5%).

Financially, median research expenditures decreased across all institution types, the first such decline since 2020. There’s also a shift in graduate student funding towards teaching assistantships (34.71%, up 5%) and away from research assistantships (54.70%, down 6%), with externally funded RAs decreasing for the second consecutive year. Finally, academic units report a net reduction in physical space per faculty member because faculty size increases have not been matched by comparable changes in total available space, alongside a slight reduction in overall staff support, notably in administrative staff. These dynamics suggest a growing but potentially strained academic environment.

We continue to have concerns about the declining response rate to the survey, as it impacts the reliability of conclusions that we draw. We also are experiencing more departments not disaggregating degree and enrollment data by gender and race/ethnicity. We encourage the community to reach out to us to identify how we can support departments in reporting their departmental data in the Taulbee Survey.